Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Supreme Court Upholds Health Reform Law

By Scott T. Silverman on June 29, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued a historic holding today, June 28, 2012.  The Court has ruled that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, together with the Health Care and Education Tax Credits Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Health Reform Act”), which had been signed into law in late March of 2010, is almost entirely constitutional.

The Court, in a 5 to 4 decision, opined that the portions of the Health Reform Act that most directly impact employers are lawful, including the polarizing individual coverage mandate taking effect in 2014.  The Court’s rationale for upholding the individual mandate was not that Congress can force individuals to buy health insurance (as the Court found that the mandate would actually violate the Commerce Clause), but rather that Congress, under its power to “lay and collect taxes,” is permitted to impose a tax on individuals for failing to have insurance.

The immediate impact of this holding on employers is fully discussed in Akerman’s Practice Group Update. In summary, the following main points should be kept in mind: (1) small employers with average wages of less than $50,000 who pay at least 50% of the premium for employees’ health insurance will be able to take an income tax credit equal to a percentage of premiums paid; (2) plan mandates continue to apply, such as (i) certain restrictions on pre-existing condition exclusions; (ii) the reduction/elimination of lifetime dollar limits and caps on annual limits on essential health benefits; (iii) the restrictions on rescission of coverage; and (iv) the extension of dependent coverage to age 26 (though this requirement does not apply to grandfathered plans if the dependent is otherwise eligible for another employer-sponsored health plan); (3) a summary of benefits and coverage must be provided commencing in the fall of 2012; (4) the aggregate cost of health coverage must be included in the 2012 W-2 for employees; (5) the $2,500 limit on health FSA spending applies for plan years after January 1, 2013; (6) state exchanges for small business health option programs must be established by 2014; and (7) large employers with over 50 employees will be subjected to fines or penalties if they don’t offer insurance, or the offered insurance is too expensive for employees, commencing in 2014.

Photo of Scott T. Silverman Scott T. Silverman

Adept at navigating complex labor and employment matters, Scott Silverman is noted by Chambers USA for being “expeditious” and “excellent at providing all points of view.” His range of experience includes representation of employers in administrative proceedings, federal and state court litigation, and…

Adept at navigating complex labor and employment matters, Scott Silverman is noted by Chambers USA for being “expeditious” and “excellent at providing all points of view.” His range of experience includes representation of employers in administrative proceedings, federal and state court litigation, and arbitrations. Although he has worked on a variety of labor and employment issues throughout his career, Scott’s practice has emphasized labor management relations, employment discrimination, non-compete/trade secret, wage and hour, and retaliation claims. Complementing his litigation practice, he advises employers on day-to-day matters, and drafts manuals and contracts for his clients.a

Read more about Scott T. SilvermanEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    HR Defense
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo