Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FDA Continues Efforts to Complete DESI Review For Certain Drug Products

By David Stein on August 14, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As part of FDA’s continuing efforts to complete its Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (DESI) review, FDA published a July 24, 2012, Federal Register notice offering companies an opportunity to affirm hearings related to certain DESI dockets.  The companies have 30 days to respond to FDA or else FDA will deem the hearing requests to be withdrawn.

The affected DESI dockets include:

  • Certain drug products containing an anticholinergic in combination with a barbiturate,
  • Combination drug containing a xanthine derivative,
  • Certain single entity antispasmatic drug ,
  • Certain drug products containing anticholinergics/antispasmodics in combination with a sedative, and single-entity antispasmodics,
  • Certain chlorthalidone drug products,
  • Certain drug products containing chlortetracycline and tetracycline,
  • Certain combination drug products containing hydrocortisone acetate and pramoxine hydrochloride

In the earlier DESI dockets applicable to these products, FDA deemed the affected products to be “less than effective” and, under the DESI procedures, the sponsor of the product was able to request a hearing on FDA’s finding.  By requesting hearings, these companies were able to prolong the DESI process and continue to market the product subject to FDA’s longstanding policy that permits a product subject to an ongoing DESI proceeding to remain on the market during the pendency of the proceeding.  (FDA rarely held hearings in response to such requests.)  Moreover, other similar products could be marketed during the pendency of these proceedings on the theory that they are “identical, related, or similar,” to these products. 

Once these DESI proceeding are concluded, however, FDA will have definitively concluded that these products – and those that are on the market as “identical, related, or similar” to them – are unapproved new drugs.  Such a finding would not only make the continued marketing of these products illegal,  but would also mean that such a product would likely no longer qualify as a “covered outpatient drug” under section 1927(k)(4) of the Social Security Act that governs the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Continuing to seek reimbursement for a drug that is not a “covered outpatient drug” may lead to liabilities under the Federal False Claims Act.

Notably, this is not the first time FDA has used such a tactic to conclude pending DESI proceedings.  In February of 2011, FDA issued a similar request for companies to affirm DESI hearing requests for a different set of drug products.  As a result, the following month, FDA issued a follow-up notice withdrawing numerous hearing requests for particular products, thus concluding the applicable DESI proceedings and categorizing the products (and those that are “identical, related, or similar,” to them) as unapproved new drugs.

Photo of David Stein David Stein

David Stein advises clients on credit reporting, financial privacy, financial technology, payments, retail financial services, and fair lending issues. He assists a broad range of financial services firms, consumer reporting agencies, financial technology companies, and their vendors with regulatory, compliance, supervision, enforcement, and…

David Stein advises clients on credit reporting, financial privacy, financial technology, payments, retail financial services, and fair lending issues. He assists a broad range of financial services firms, consumer reporting agencies, financial technology companies, and their vendors with regulatory, compliance, supervision, enforcement, and transactional matters.

Mr. Stein has significant experience advising clients on compliance with the FCRA, GLBA, ECOA, EFTA, E-Sign Act, TILA, TISA, FDCPA, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and FTC Act, as well as state financial privacy laws. Mr. Stein is a member of the firm’s fintech and artificial intelligence initiatives and works with clients on issues related to cutting edge technologies, such as blockchain, virtual currencies, big data and data analytics, artificial intelligence, online lending, and payments technology.

Mr. Stein previously served in senior regulatory, policy-making, and management positions at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). He played a significant role in developing regulations and policy on credit reporting, financial privacy, retail payments systems, consumer credit, fair lending, overdraft services, debit interchange, unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and mortgage origination and servicing. Mr. Stein draws upon his government experience in representing clients before the CFPB, the FRB, and other regulatory agencies and leverages his insights into the regulatory process to provide clients with practical, actionable advice.

Read more about David SteinEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo