Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

U.S. Department of Transportation Fines Pakistan Int’l Airlines $150,000 for Violating Tarmac Delay Rule

By Patrick Rizzi on September 24, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The U.S. Department of Transportation imposed a $150,000 civil penalty on Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) for violating the relatively new “tarmac delay” rule.  PAIOrder

In this case, the flight from Manchester (UK) to New York’s JFK International Airport diverted to Washington Dulles International during an October 2011 “early winter weather event” which caused significant equipment issues outages at JFK and major Air Traffic Control issues throughout the Northeast United States.  The captain of the flight tried to divert to PIA’s principal diversion airport, Boston Logan, but Logan was unable to accommodate the flight due to a high volume of diverted international flights arriving there.  Accordingly, due to the limited amount of fuel remaining, the captain diverted the flight to Dulles, another airport which had been given a copy of PIA’s tarmac delay plan in August 2011.   The aircraft was directed to a remote aircraft bay/de-icing pad.  The crew intended the stop to be simply for refueling, but refueling was delayed because of the demand for fuel by numerous other diverted aircraft and the PIA aircraft’s remote location.

The flight crew exited the aircraft via air stairs to conduct external safety inspections of the aircraft but concluded that it was not safe to deplane the passengers by the stairs, particularly given the inclement weather and the fact that there were a number of children onboard, as well as a number of passengers requiring wheelchairs.  The Department nonetheless found that PIA violated the tarmac delay rule because its efforts to deplane were inadequate:

PIA made no other attempts to deplane passengers on flight 711 by any other means (e.g., via a gate or mobile airport lounge) or to solicit assistance from the airport operator in deplaning because, according to PIA, the passengers did not indicate a desire to deplane during the tarmac delay.  PIA also never contacted CBP at IAD to inquire about deplaning passengers.”

Although no passengers complained during or since the episode about the delay or PIA’s handling of it, the Department concluded that PIA had violated the tarmac delay rule when it was delayed on the tarmac for more than four hours.  Accordingly, it imposed a civil penalty of $150,000 on PIA with half suspended and to be forgiven if PIA does not violate the cease-and-desist provision before November 1, 2014.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo