Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Last Day Filings at the CBCA: Time is Not on Your Side

By Jonathan M. Baker on February 6, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals reminded us last week how unforgiving the Board’s timeliness rules can be for unsuspecting contractors.  In Schunck v. General Services Administration, January 31, 2013, CBCA No. 3079, the Board dismissed the appellant’s case because it was not timely filed under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7101, et seq.  The CDA states that an appeal of a final contracting officer’s decision must be filed “[w]ithin ninety days from the date of receipt of [the] decision.”  41 U.S.C. § 7104(a).  The Board’s Rules then define when a notice of appeal is considered “filed.”  Specifically, Board Rule 1(b)(5)(i) states that the notice of appeal is “filed upon the earlier of its receipt by the Office of the Clerk of the Board or if mailed, the date on which it is mailed to the Board.  A United States Postal Service postmark shall be prima facie evidence that the document with which it is associated was mailed on the date of the postmark.”

In Schunck, the appellant sent his notice of appeal to the Board on the last possible day – the 90th day after receipt of the contracting officer’s decision – and the Board received the package the following day.  The problem for the appellant, however, was that he shipped the package via Federal Express overnight delivery instead of using the United States Postal Service.  Thus, because the notice of appeal was not “mailed” or received by the Board within 90 days, it was not timely filed and the Board lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.  Even though the Board likely received the notice of appeal via Federal Express sooner than it would have received it had it been sent using regular U.S. mail, the rules are the rules, and the appellant in Schunck did not comply with them.

The obvious lesson from Schunck is that it is never wise to wait until the last day to file.  But what about those instances where a 90th-day filing simply cannot be avoided?  Are you then stuck with U.S. mail?  This is where knowing the Board’s rules is critical.  The Board not only permits U.S. mail, but it also accepts filings by hand delivery, facsimile, and email, subject to certain limitations.  Rule 1(b)(5).

Photo of Jonathan M. Baker Jonathan M. Baker

Jonathan M. Baker is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Jon advises clients on a wide array of government contracts legal issues, including both federal and state bid protests, prime-sub disputes, government contracts…

Jonathan M. Baker is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Jon advises clients on a wide array of government contracts legal issues, including both federal and state bid protests, prime-sub disputes, government contracts due diligence and transactions, regulatory compliance, and contract terminations. Jon’s practice has a notable emphasis on technology-related issues, including counseling clients in the areas of patent and data rights, responding to government challenges to technical data and computer software rights assertions, and litigating cases involving complex and cutting edge technologies. Jon also provides guidance on national security matters, such as National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual compliance and facility and security clearance matters. In addition, Jon has advised clients on local government contract negotiation, internal and government investigations regarding potential False Claims Act issues, and export violations. Jon is also actively involved in the firm’s pro bono program, having litigated prisoner neglect, parental rights termination, and landlord-tenant matters.

Read more about Jonathan M. BakerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    Government Contracts Legal Forum
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo