Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Health Care Reform – Minimum Value Calculator Available

By Monique Warren on February 24, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) released a minimum value calculator to determine whether the percentage of the total allowed costs of benefits provided under a group health plan is at least 60% – a requirement in order for the employer plan to be treated as offering minimum essential coverage. If the employer’s plan meets the minimum value test and is affordable (i.e., single coverage does not cost an employee more than 9.5% of income) a fulltime employee cannot obtain subsidized Exchange coverage. An employee who does obtain subsidized Exchange coverage does not trigger employer penalties (see our prior post on this topic). 

The calculator was released “for informal external testing” in conjunction with HHS’ release of final regulations on the standards related to essential health benefits, actuarial value, and accreditation under the 2010 health care reform law. HHS also provided an explanation of the calculator methodology which, among other things, makes clear that the calculator is based on a standard population and data reflecting typical self-insured employee plans.   

As an alternative to the calculator and checklists, an employer may engage an actuary who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries to determine, using generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies, whether the plan meets the 60% minimum value threshold.

In addition, IRS said in previous guidance that it would release checklists employers may use as safe harbor methods for determining whether a plan meets the minimum value test. Those checklists have not yet been released but may be crucial for employers with plans that have nonstandard features and for which an actuarial determination is impractical.   

Photo of Monique Warren Monique Warren

Monique Warren is a principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She counsels employers on employee benefits compliance and administrative matters, represents employers to government agencies, and prepares plan documents and related employee communications.

Monique’s expertise includes health…

Monique Warren is a principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She counsels employers on employee benefits compliance and administrative matters, represents employers to government agencies, and prepares plan documents and related employee communications.

Monique’s expertise includes health and welfare plans as well as retirement plans. She has extensive experience helping plan sponsors navigate COBRA, HIPAA, and other ERISA and Internal Revenue Code provisions and correct compliance issues. A significant part of her practice currently focuses on defending employers in federal investigations of their group health plans as well as assisting government contractors with fulfilling fringe benefit obligations. She also has extensive experience helping retirement plan sponsors comply with ERISA fiduciary requirements and the Code’s qualification requirements and correcting plan errors under the Department of Labor’s and Internal Revenue Service’s voluntary correction programs.

Read more about Monique WarrenEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Benefits Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo