Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The SEC and CFTC Pull All their Registrants into the Identity Theft Red-Flag Rule Requirements

By Daniel Nathan & Ana-Maria Ignat on April 19, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The SEC and CFTC recently issued rules and guidelines requiring the entities they regulate to adopt rules to address the risks of identity theft, that is, “fraud committed or attempted using the identifying information of another person without authority.” The final rules require “financial institutions” and “creditors” that offer and maintain “covered accounts” to develop and implement a written identity theft prevention program, including reasonable policies and procedures designed to identify, detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft. The rules contain guidelines to assist in the design and maintenance of programs that would satisfy the requirements of the rules.

While these rules close the loop left open by similar rules under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as a practical matter, entities registered with the CFTC and the SEC, such as futures commission merchants, broker-dealers, investment companies, and investment advisers, already were covered by the FCRA. The new rules pull within their purview recent registrants with the SEC, private fund and hedge fund advisers to the financial institutions that must ensure that they have appropriate identity theft red-flag programs.

There are several notable takeaways from this development:

  • The two agencies refused to expressly exempt from the scope of the rules any registered entities that qualify as “financial institutions” and “creditors.”
  • Instead of requiring specific policies and procedures for identifying red-flags, the SEC and CFTC provided regulated entities flexibility in determining which red flags are most relevant to their businesses and in responding and adapting to new emerging forms of identity theft.
  • The duty of financial institutions and creditors to have reasonable policies and procedures to update their identity theft programs to reflect changing risks from identity theft is ongoing.

Read client alert.

Daniel Nathan

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory…

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory entities involving financial institutions or transactions. Mr. Nathan also consults with financial institutions on examinations, supervisory procedures, product disclosure and supervision, and other regulatory matters.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    IM Insights
  • Organization:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo