Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

SEC to Broker-Dealers: More Oversight, Fewer Madoffs?

By Daniel Nathan & Adam Fleisher on August 7, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published a Final Rule earlier last week amending certain annual reporting, audit, and notification requirements for broker-dealers in the broker-dealer reporting rule (Rule 17a-5) and the broker-dealer notification rule (Rule 17a-11).  These amendments were enacted using the additional authority provided to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act).  The PCAOB is empowered to establish standards with regard to audits of broker-dealer reports filed with the SEC, and, thus, the PCAOB is in a position to exercise its standard-setting authority over audits of broker-dealers registered with the SEC.  The primary impetus for the amendments apparently was the series of high-profile cases involving fraudulent conduct by investment advisers and broker-dealers, such as the Bernie Madoff and Stanford International Bank scandals.  Furthermore, this action may be in part a response to findings by the PCAOB last summer of consistent problems with the work done by auditors of broker-dealers.

The Final Rule will increase the reporting requirements of broker-dealers, and expose them—and their auditing firms—to greater scrutiny. Broker-dealers (BDs) must file annual reports with the SEC that consist of a financial report along with either (1) a compliance report, or (2) an exemption report.  In addition, all BDs must file reports prepared by independent public accountants that cover the internally-prepared reports.  Such accountants must be registered with the PCAOB and the review must be consistent with PCAOB standards (as opposed to generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS)).

In addition, the Final Rule requires accountants to immediately notify the BDs of any noncompliance issues that arise during the course of preparing the accountants’ reports.  If an accountant finds any material weakness in the BD’s internal compliance controls, the accountant must notify the BD, and the BD may in turn have to file notice with the SEC and the BD’s designated examining authority (DEA).

The other significant component of the Final Rule is the requirement that a BD that clears transactions or carries customer accounts must allow the SEC or DEA examiners to review the background materials supporting the reports as provided by the BD’s independent public accountant.  The BD must permit the accountant to discuss findings related to its reports with examiners when requested in connection with a regulatory examination of the BD.  Finally, the Rule’s amendments also include new form filing requirements and new technical amendments. More detail on the Final Rule is provided in our client alert.

Daniel Nathan

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory…

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory entities involving financial institutions or transactions. Mr. Nathan also consults with financial institutions on examinations, supervisory procedures, product disclosure and supervision, and other regulatory matters.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    IM Insights
  • Organization:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo