Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Additional Causes of Action in Oppression Litigation – Corporate Opportunity Doctrine

By Scott I. Unger on August 19, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Often, business break-up or oppression litigation will include allegations that one side or the other breached fiduciary duties. Courts have consistently recognized shareholders who owe certain fiduciary duties to the other shareholders and corporate entity.  See, Orchard v. Covelli, 590 F.Supp. 1548, 1556 (W.D. Pa. 1984) (citing various Delaware cases).   The corporate opportunity doctrine prohibits directors, officers and employees from personally taking advantage of business opportunities that fall within the company’s business activities.  For example, if a shareholder of a law firm that handles personal injury cases is approached by  potential personal injury client, that shareholder must bring the case to her law firm. If she were to handle the case “on the side,” without the knowledge or consent of the other shareholders and corporation, she breached fiduciary duties  because officers, directors and employees are prohibited from competing with the corporation.   See, Levy  & Surrick v. Surrick, 362 Pa. Super. 510, 524 A.2d 993, 995 (1987).

Photo of Scott I. Unger Scott I. Unger

Scott I. Unger is a member of Stark & Stark’s Litigation Group, where he concentrates his practice on litigation arising out of business and commercial disputes. Mr. Unger regularly counsels business owners on the prosecution and defense of minority oppression litigation (corporate divorces)…

Scott I. Unger is a member of Stark & Stark’s Litigation Group, where he concentrates his practice on litigation arising out of business and commercial disputes. Mr. Unger regularly counsels business owners on the prosecution and defense of minority oppression litigation (corporate divorces), breach of contract cases, uniform commercial code (U.C.C.) litigation, consumer fraud claims, appellate practice, employment, and estate litigation.

Read more about Scott I. UngerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    New Jersey Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Stark & Stark
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo