Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

AML Enforcement Focuses on BDs Doing Business in Mexico

By Daniel Nathan & Marc-Alain Galeazzi on February 6, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

FINRA recently took formal disciplinary action against a New York-based broker-dealer that is affiliated with a Mexican broker-dealer and with a Mexican bank for inadequate anti-money laundering (AML) systems and procedures. FINRA also found that the broker-dealer failed to register 200 to 400 foreign finders who functioned as the firm’s primary points of contact with its Mexican clientele. FINRA considers Mexico to be a high-risk jurisdiction for anti-money laundering purposes. To learn more about this enforcement action and some takeaways, please read our full client alert.

FINRA is not alone in recognizing the money-laundering risk presented by financial entities doing business in Mexico. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) director Jennifer Shasky Calvery spoke at a January 30, 2014 SIFMA conference about Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and AML issues from FinCEN’s point of view. Ms. Shasky Calvery stated that FinCEN’s newly established Intelligence Division will help FinCEN stay current on how money is being laundered in the United States, and will share this expertise with law enforcement, regulatory, industry and foreign financial intelligence unit partners. That will enable FinCEN to serve as the cornerstone of the United States’ AML and counter-terrorist financing regime.

In particular, Ms. Shasky Calvery pointed out that FinCEN’s analysis recently revealed that Mexican casas de bolsa (Mexican securities firms) are starting to bring U.S. dollars into the United States and depositing this cash into U.S. financial institutions. To the extent that foreign securities are obtained easily with cash, U.S. firms dealing with foreign firms should be mindful of the cash aspects and source of funding of their business, given the heightened money laundering risks associated with cash. In her remarks, Ms. Shasky Calvery also addressed the importance of a strong compliance culture within financial institutions, the necessity of information sharing within and between financial institutions, and the value of the BSA data that FinCEN receives from financial institutions, in particular from their SAR filings.

Daniel Nathan

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory…

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory entities involving financial institutions or transactions. Mr. Nathan also consults with financial institutions on examinations, supervisory procedures, product disclosure and supervision, and other regulatory matters.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    IM Insights
  • Organization:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo