Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Congress Delays Medicare Cuts until 2015

By Sheppard Mullin & Ethan Stanislawski on April 1, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 31, the Senate voted to pass yet another “doc fix” bill, which had been approved by the House the week before.  This doc fix bill marks the 17th time that Congress has postponed the implementation of the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) payment formula since 2003.  It comes at the 11th hour, as the SGR, put in place by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, would have meant a sharp 23.7% drop in Medicare payments just hours later on April 1.

The SGR payment formula was originally proposed so that amounts paid by Medicare for services would track the overall growth of the economy.  However, when healthcare costs grew much more quickly than the economy, flaws in the SGR payment formula were revealed because payments to providers would have been insufficient to cover their costs.  Congress has not yet passed a long term solution to this problem, and has relied on almost annual doc fixes to avoid a sudden drop in Medicare payments to providers.

This latest doc fix, entitled Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, again temporarily delays the looming cuts in Medicare payments, replacing the 24% cut with a 0.5% payment update through the rest of 2014, and also delays the implementation of the two-midnight rule (in which Medicare will only pay for inpatient hospital admission if the patient requires a stay of at last two midnights) until March 31, 2015.

Congress is still working on a full repeal of the SGR.  Although the House recently passed a bill that would repeal the SGR and replace it with a system that rewards providers based on quality measures or participation in an alternative payment model like ACOs, Congress has yet to find a way to pay for the change.  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that repealing the SGR would cost approximately $116.5 billion over ten years.

Photo of Ethan Stanislawski Ethan Stanislawski

Ethan is Director of Customer Success at LexBlog managing day-to-day operations of a small team, as well as overseeing the long-term vision of all customer-facing interactions. He works with clients at all stages of a blog’s creation, from launch to any issues that…

Ethan is Director of Customer Success at LexBlog managing day-to-day operations of a small team, as well as overseeing the long-term vision of all customer-facing interactions. He works with clients at all stages of a blog’s creation, from launch to any issues that may arise in the future. Ethan brings over nine years of experience in Customer Support and Customer Success at major tech companies and startups alike. He’s helped create and overhaul support operations for Hulu, FOX, and Flipagram. After obtaining a Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Chicago, he did graduate work in journalism at Indiana University, and his writing credits include The Village Voice, Vulture, and Prefix Magazine.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo