Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

European Union Close To Adopting Trade Secret Directive

By PJ Kee on June 4, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

EUThe U.S. Senate is not alone when considering whether to federalize trade secret law, as the European Parliament and Council will soon discuss proposed legislation aimed at normalizing trade secret law for EU member states. The European Commission proposed a draft directive to both the Parliament and the Council in November 2013, and now the European Council has issued its opinion.

The Council agreed with the draft directive’s general framework for adopting an EU-wide trade secrets directive (though revised), with the president-in-office of the Competitiveness Council lauding the opinion:

Today, we have decided on a single, clear and coherent legal regime protecting against misappropriation of trade secrets in EU Member States. This decision will promote innovative companies, ensure fair and honest competition and create a secure environment conducting to innovation, the exchange of valuable know-how and cross-border commercial activities within the internal market. This will empower companies to continue investing with more confidence in research and innovation in Europe.

The general framework has five main features, including an employee-friendly component that is somewhat foreign to US legislation:

  • Minimum harmonization of the different civil law regimes within the member states—but a recognition that individual member states can pass stricter trade secret laws;
  • Agreement on common principles, definitions, safeguards, procedures, and remedies in civil litigation, but not criminal proceedings;
  • Six-year statute of limitation period for trade secret theft cases;
  • Guidelines for preserving confidentiality in trade secret litigation within member states; and
  • Damage limitation for employees who did not intentionally misappropriate their employers’ trade secrets.

The Parliament has not yet released its opinion on the draft directive, but the Council hopes the two can agree on a final directive during the first reading. We will continue to monitor the legislative process and will provide an analysis of the Parliament’s opinion once it’s released.

Photo of PJ Kee PJ Kee

PJ Kee is an Editor and Founder of the Trade Secret Insider and a member of Jones Walker’s Trade Secret and Non-Compete Team. He regularly litigates cases involving trade secret theft, non-competes, computer fraud, conspiracies, and unfair competition, and counsels clients on strategies…

PJ Kee is an Editor and Founder of the Trade Secret Insider and a member of Jones Walker’s Trade Secret and Non-Compete Team. He regularly litigates cases involving trade secret theft, non-competes, computer fraud, conspiracies, and unfair competition, and counsels clients on strategies to protect their trade secrets. Mr. Kee also represents clients in criminal proceedings and litigates complex commercial and employment matters involving various breach-of-contract claims, business torts, invasion of privacy claims, defamation, and wage and hour disputes. He can be reached at pkee@joneswalker.com or 504.582.8230.

Read more about PJ KeeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Trade Secret Insider
  • Organization:
    Jones Walker LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo