Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FINRA Issues Guidance Notice on Confidentiality Provisions in Settlement Agreements and the Arbitration Discovery Process

By Jeff Kern on November 12, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In Regulatory Notice 14-40, FINRA reminds members that it is a violation of FINRA Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade) to incorporate into a settlement agreement a confidentiality provision restricting or prohibiting a customer or other person from communicating with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), FINRA, or any federal or state regulatory authority regarding a possible securities law violation.

While FINRA has previously addressed the use of confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements, see, e.g., Regulatory Notice 04-44 (June 2004), Notice 14-40 goes further than FINRA’s prior guidance and targets provisions silencing whistleblowers.  In its most recent notice, FINRA reminds firms that a confidentiality provision cannot impede an individual from initiating communications directly with a regulatory authority regarding the settlement terms or underlying facts of a dispute, regardless of whether the individual has received an inquiry from a regulator regarding the dispute.  According to FINRA, then, a party may at any time notify FINRA or the SEC of a possible securities law violation—notwithstanding a confidentiality provision to the contrary.

In that respect, FINRA advises that a confidentiality provision should expressly allow a party to initiate direct communications with, or respond to an inquiry from, a regulator.  It offers as an example the following clause:

Any non-disclosure provision in this agreement does not prohibit or restrict you (or your attorney) from initiating communications directly with, or responding to any inquiry from, or providing testimony before, the SEC, FINRA, any other self-regulatory organization or any other state or federal regulatory authority, regarding this settlement or its underlying facts or circumstances.

In addition, Notice 14-40 cautions firms about the use of confidentiality provisions during the discovery process.  FINRA makes it clear that a provision concerning the non-disclosure of documents outside of the arbitration of the particular case does not apply to the sharing of documents with a regulator.  It also warns that the use of a confidentiality provision in a discovery stipulation that restrict a party’s ability to communicate directly with or in response to an inquiry from a regulatory authority violates FINRA Rule 2010.

Notice 14-40 reflects FINRA’s continued efforts to encourage and protect whistleblowers.  Accordingly, member firms should ensure that the confidentiality provisions in their settlement agreements and discovery stipulations do not in any way impede a party’s ability to reach out to a regulatory authority concerning a possible securities violation.

Photo of Jeff Kern Jeff Kern

Jeff Kern is a partner in the Governmental Practice and serves as a Managing Partner of Sheppard Mullin’s New York office. Jeff also heads the firm’s Securities Enforcement & Litigation Team and is a charter member of the Blockchain & Digital Assets Team.

Read more about Jeff KernEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Corporate & Securities Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo