Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Flakeboard and SierraPine Pay Civil Penalties and Disgorgement of Profits to Settle DOJ’s Charges of Unlawful Gun Jumping

By Michele S. Harrington & Leigh Oliver on November 18, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The antitrust agencies remain vigilant in prohibiting “gun jumping” — the unlawful coordination of parties to a transaction during the pre-HSR clearance and pre-closing time periods. On 7 November 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a settlement under which parties to an abandoned transaction agreed to pay a total of nearly US$5 million in fines — US$3.8 million in civil penalties to settle claims of unlawful gun-jumping under the HSR Act and an additional US$1.15 million from the purchaser in disgorgement of illegally obtained profits in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act. The parties also agreed to implement antitrust compliance programs and not to share certain information or reach certain agreements during pre-closing periods with other parties to acquisition agreements in which they may become involved.

Read More: Flakeboard and SierraPine Pay Civil Penalties and Disgorgement of Profits to Settle DOJ’s Charges of Unlawful Gun Jumping

  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo