Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Following Its Order in Cook v. Arias, the Idaho Supreme Court Orders That Any Judgment Entered Before April 15, 2015, That Was Intended To Be Final But Does Not Comply With Idaho Rule Of Civil Procedure 54(A), Shall Be Treated As A Final Judgment

By Christopher Pooser on February 12, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The saga regarding what is a final, appealable judgment under Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 54(a) continued today. The Idaho Supreme Court entered the following order:

WHEREAS there are a number of judgments that have been previously entered that do not comply with Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 54( a) or Idaho Rule of Family Law Procedure 803;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any judgment, decree or order entered before April 15, 2015, that was intended to be final but which did not comply with Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 54(a) or Idaho Rule of Family Law Procedure 803 shall be treated as a final judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that as of April 15, 2015, all final judgments must comply with Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 54(a) or Idaho Rule of Family Law Procedure 803.

The order can be found here. The order follows the Court’s order in Cook v. Arias, Dkt. No. 41745 (Feb. 6, 2015), which I understand created a firestorm from family law magistrates and practitioners. As noted in a blog post entered earlier this week, Cook continues a litany of decisions from the Court on the meaning of a final judgment under I.R.C.P. 54(a).

Photo of Christopher Pooser Christopher Pooser

Christopher Pooser represents clients before federal and state appellate courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Idaho Supreme Court. His appellate practice focuses on helping clients assess their tolerance for risk on appeal and ultimately positioning them for success on…

Christopher Pooser represents clients before federal and state appellate courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Idaho Supreme Court. His appellate practice focuses on helping clients assess their tolerance for risk on appeal and ultimately positioning them for success on appeal. He also works with trial attorneys to ensure the facts and legal issues are carefully developed and presented and a complete trial record is preserved for appeal.

Click here for Chris Pooser’s full bio.

Read more about Christopher PooserEmailChristopher's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    Notice of Appeal
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo