Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Final Rule on Human Trafficking Prevention Set to Take Effect and Require Additional Compliance Actions for Certain Contractors

By Lorraine M. Campos & Nkechi Kanu on February 27, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Starting the first week of March , federal contractors will be subject to new prohibitions and obligations related to human trafficking. These new requirements stem from a final rule issued January 29, 2015, that significantly strengthens the Federal Acquisition Regulation’s (FAR) existing provisions to prevent trafficking in persons. The new rule goes into effect March 2, 2015, and will apply to all new contracts, as well as future orders under existing indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts.

Prohibitions

The final rule prohibits government contractors and their employees from undertaking certain actions related to:

  • Engaging in severe forms of human trafficking during the period of performance of the contract
  • Procuring commercial sex acts during the period of performance of the contract
  • Using forced labor in the performance of the contract
  • Destroying, concealing, confiscating or otherwise denying employees’ access to identity or immigration documents
  • Engaging in fraudulent or misleading recruitment practices
  • Employing recruiters who violate the labor laws of the country where the recruitment takes place
  • Charging recruiting fees
  • Failing to provide return transportation to an employee who is not a national of the country where the work is to take place, subject to limited exceptions
  • Providing housing, if required, that fails to meet host country safety or housing laws, or
  • Failing to provide a written work document, if required

Contractor Obligations

The new rule also requires government contractors to undertake the following actions to combat trafficking in persons:

  • Inform employees and agents of the human trafficking requirements and the possible repercussions if violations occur
  • Disclose information to the relevant contracting officers concerning human trafficking offenses
  • Cooperate in investigations into human trafficking offenses
  • Protect victims and witnesses of human trafficking offenses

Compliance and Certification

A key component of the new rule is the requirement that certain government contractors implement a compliance plan and certification requirements. If any part of a government contract with an estimated value of more than $500,000 is for supplies acquired overseas or services to be performed overseas, the offeror must certify that: (1) it has implemented an anti-human trafficking compliance plan and procedures to prevent human trafficking violations; and (2) it has performed due diligence on its agents and subcontractors, and taken necessary remedial actions.

Government contractors should review their compliance plans to ensure that they have adequate mechanisms in place to comply with the new rule’s more robust requirements, and to monitor and evaluate the extent to which their suppliers are in compliance with the new requirements. A violation of these regulations may result in suspension of contract payments, termination of a contract, or suspension or debarment, as well as False Claims Act and other liability.

Photo of Lorraine M. Campos Lorraine M. Campos

Lorraine M. Campos is a partner and member of the Steering Committee of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group and focuses her practice on assisting clients with a variety of issues related to government contracts, government ethics, campaign finance, and lobbying laws. Lorraine…

Lorraine M. Campos is a partner and member of the Steering Committee of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group and focuses her practice on assisting clients with a variety of issues related to government contracts, government ethics, campaign finance, and lobbying laws. Lorraine regularly counsels clients on all aspects of the General Services Administration (GSA) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) programs. She also routinely advises clients on the terms and conditions of these agreements, including the Price Reduction Clause, small business subcontracting requirements, and country of origin restrictions mandated under U.S. trade agreements, such as the Trade Agreements Act and the Buy American Act. Additionally, Lorraine advises life sciences companies, in particular, pharmaceutical and medical device companies, on federal procurement and federal pricing statutes, including the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992.

Lorraine has been ranked by Chambers USA since 2013, and she was recognized by Profiles in Diversity Journal as one of their “Women Worth Watching” for 2015. Additionally, Lorraine is active in the American Bar Association’s Section of Public Contract Law and serves as co-chair of the Health Care Contracting Committee.

Lorraine joined the firm from Reed Smith, where she chaired their Government Contracts & Grants Team since 2010. Prior to that, she worked as a consultant for Grant Thornton, where she advised the Intelligence Community, analyzed the Department of Defense utility privatization program, and performed numerous Circular A-76 studies for the Office of Management and Budget.

Read more about Lorraine M. CamposEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Nkechi Kanu Nkechi Kanu
Email
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo