Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Pet Problems

By Keller and Heckman LLP on February 27, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Pet food class action lawsuit filed against major manufacturer.

  • A class action lawsuit has been filed against Nestlé Purina PetCare Company alleging that ingredients in the company’s Beneful product line pose the risk of adverse health effects or death to pets.
  • Among other issues, the lawsuit calls into question the permissible use of propylene glycol, a known component of antifreeze that also is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) under FDA regulations for use in animal feed and pet food (except for cat food).
  • Nestlé Purina has secured dismissals of previous class action lawsuits based on similar allegations and the fate of the current suit remains to be seen.  Nevertheless, the suit serves as a reminder to industry that even “FDA-approved” or GRAS ingredients are subject to scrutiny and consumer attack where negative perceptions or suspicions of negative health effects may be associated with the substances.
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    The Daily Intake
  • Organization:
    Keller Heckman
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo