Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

UK Parliamentary report calls for a new legal framework for UK secret intelligence agencies

By Mark Taylor & Charlie Hawes on March 25, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

LockThe Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) of the UK Parliament has published its much anticipated report into the secret capabilities of the UK intelligence and security agencies (MI6, MI5 and GCHQ), in particular their powers to intercept electronic communications and acquire communications data. The full report is available here.

The key recommendation of the report (entitled “Privacy and Security: A modern and transparent legal framework”) is that the UK’s current laws governing the activities of the agencies be replaced in their entirety by a new, transparent, legal framework. The report proposes a new single Act of Parliament that improves transparency, strengthens privacy protections and increases oversight of the agencies’ use of their intrusive capabilities. While these proposals are in outline only, the report also makes specific recommendations about each of the capabilities in question.

The UK Government has previously stated its intent to introduce fresh legislation in this area before the end of 2016. Nevertheless, as the ISC is the Parliamentary Committee with statutory authority for oversight of the agencies and the UK’s secret intelligence community, its recommendations are likely to set the direction of travel in policy terms and shape how the draft legislation is formulated. The publication of the report, in effect, fires the starting pistol on what is likely to be an intense debate over the provisions of the new law.

The report is the result of an eighteen month long inquiry by the ISC, prompted by allegations made in relation to UK secret intelligence agencies following Edward Snowden’s leak of classified intelligence material in June 2013. It contains a considerable amount of information that was not previously in the public domain, and weighs in at 149 pages, with 54 conclusions and recommendations.

We anticipate providing further analysis of various aspects of the report in future blog posts.

Photo of Mark Taylor Mark Taylor

Mark is a partner in Hogan Lovells’ Intellectual Property, Media and Technology Group in London with particular expertise in technology and outsourcing matters. Mark specialises in advising all aspects of the development, exploitation, implementation and outsourcing of IT and novel technologies. He also…

Mark is a partner in Hogan Lovells’ Intellectual Property, Media and Technology Group in London with particular expertise in technology and outsourcing matters. Mark specialises in advising all aspects of the development, exploitation, implementation and outsourcing of IT and novel technologies. He also regularly advises on disputes, intellectual property and data protection issues related to these areas. Mark is a Trustee of the Society for Computers and Law.

Read more about Mark TaylorEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Charlie Hawes Charlie Hawes
Read more about Charlie HawesEmail
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy, Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Global Media and Communications Watch
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo