Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

What stops mobile money payments in South Africa?

By Bridget King & Sascha Graham on April 1, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Despite the increase in mobile payment services globally, the terms “mobile money” and/or “mobile payment services” are not specifically regulated in any piece of South African legislation. However, the acceptance of deposits from the general public by a person (natural or juristic) is regulated by the Banks Act

Section 11 provides that only a registered bank may conduct the business of a bank. The business of a bank includes the acceptance of deposits as well as the soliciting of or advertising for deposits from the general public as a regular feature of business.

The payment of funds by a customer into a mobile money account would constitute a deposit in contravention of the Banks Act because the “open-loop” system allows the depositor to withdraw the deposit or any remaining funds, on demand.

The South African Reserve Bank also has the regulatory and supervisory power under the National Payment System Act, 1998 (NPS Act) to manage and control payment system risk.

Although not specifically referred to as “mobile money”, the Reserve Bank has given its stance on the concept of electronic money in a position paper on e-money published in 2009. E-money is the monetary value represented by a claim on the issuer. This money is stored electronically and is generally accepted as a means of payment by others and is redeemable by the customer on demand for physical cash or as a deposit into a bank account. Only registered South African banks can issue e-money.

It is possible for a non-bank to enter into arrangements with a bank to allow them to offer payment-related services in conjunction with the bank. However, approval of the Registrar of Banks is required for such a joint venture.

Photo of Bridget King Bridget King
Read more about Bridget KingEmail
Photo of Sascha Graham Sascha Graham
Read more about Sascha GrahamEmail
  • Posted in:
    Financial, International
  • Blog:
    Financial services: Regulation tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Stridon News and Insights
  • Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
  • Labor and Employment Law Insights
  • Age of Disruption
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo