Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

A Panel of Law Clerks from the Idaho Supreme Court and Idaho Court of Appeals Gives Tips on Appellate Briefs

By Christopher Pooser & Andrea Reynolds on April 10, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Idaho Appellate Practice Section of the Idaho State Bar held its annual meeting on Thursday, April 9. As part of the meeting, a panel of law clerks from the Idaho Supreme Court and the Idaho Court of Appeals discussed what they have learned regarding the dos and don’ts of appellate practice during their clerkships. Here are some key points related to briefing:

  • Keep your writing clean and clear.
  • Maintain a professional and respectful tone—do not disparage the trial court or opposing counsel, as it distracts from your argument.
  • The Idaho Supreme Court uses the “Nature of the Case” section of the appellant’s and respondent’s opening briefs to help determine whether an appeal should be retained by the Court or assigned to the Court of Appeals.
  • An introduction can be helpful to give an outline and overview of the argument.
  • Some clerks use the table of contents to familiarize themselves with the case and guide their review.
  • The appellant should state the facts in a straightforward manner; the respondent can use the fact section to redirect the Court.
  • The facts are important, but cases are won or lost on the law.
  • When describing the lower court’s decision, consider quoting from the decision rather than simply characterizing it.
  • Include citations to the record in your statement of facts and in your argument.
  • If there is no law directly on point, consider citing to the secondary sources that are typically relied on by the Court.
  • Always be mindful of the standard of review.

The panel of law clerks included Paul Hendrikson (Justice J. Jones), Maren Adams (Justice Eismann), Brian Church (Judge Gutierrez), and John Spaulding (Judge Lansing). Alison Graham (Judge Gutierrez) moderated.

 

Photo of Christopher Pooser Christopher Pooser

Christopher Pooser represents clients before federal and state appellate courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Idaho Supreme Court. His appellate practice focuses on helping clients assess their tolerance for risk on appeal and ultimately positioning them for success on…

Christopher Pooser represents clients before federal and state appellate courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Idaho Supreme Court. His appellate practice focuses on helping clients assess their tolerance for risk on appeal and ultimately positioning them for success on appeal. He also works with trial attorneys to ensure the facts and legal issues are carefully developed and presented and a complete trial record is preserved for appeal.

Click here for Chris Pooser’s full bio.

Read more about Christopher PooserEmailChristopher's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Andrea Reynolds Andrea Reynolds

Andrea Reynolds is an associate practicing in the firm’s Litigation group and advises clients in a variety of litigation matters. She has represented clients in commercial and corporate matters in state and federal court and is also experienced in appellate litigation.

Read more about Andrea ReynoldsEmail
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    Notice of Appeal
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo