Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NY Department of Financial Services: Check Your Vendors’ Cybersecurity

By Daniel Nathan & Kevin J. Matta on April 23, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

According to a report released last week by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), the financial industry has a long way to go in overseeing the cybersecurity capabilities of outside vendors who carry out critical banking functions.

Last week’s report follows a year of activity on that front. In a May 2014 report, the NYDFS concluded—based on a survey of over 150 banks—that the financial industry’s increasing reliance on third-party vendors could create critical cybersecurity risks. Following that report, the NYDFS conducted a second survey of 40 banks concerning how they address cybersecurity with respect to third-party vendors. The second survey resulted in last week’s report. As a result of its findings, the NYDFS is considering new regulation that would impact financial institution oversight of third-party vendors.

THE NYDFS REPORT’S FINDINGS REGARDING VENDORS AND CYBERSECURITY

Last week’s report on vendors focused on four critical areas:

1. due diligence processes;
2. policies and procedures governing relationships with third-party vendors;
3. protections for safeguarding sensitive data; and
4. protections against loss incurred by third-party failures.

According to the report, almost every institution surveyed conducted risk-based due diligence on vendors, classifying vendors with access to sensitive data as high-risk, and conducting cybersecurity risk assessments on those vendors. In addition, 90 percent of surveyed institutions require vendors to comply with cybersecurity standards. However, fewer than half of the institutions surveyed required on-site due diligence of vendors: only 46 percent required initial on-site due diligence of potential vendors; and even fewer—35 percent—required periodic on-site due diligence of even those vendors classified as high-risk.

A more complete analysis of the report can be found in our client alert, available here.

Daniel Nathan

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory…

Mr. Nathan is a partner in the firm’s Securities Litigation, Enforcement and White-Collar Defense Group. Mr. Nathan’s practice includes representation of companies and individuals who are involved as witnesses or subjects in investigations conducted by the SEC, the CFTC, FINRA and other regulatory entities involving financial institutions or transactions. Mr. Nathan also consults with financial institutions on examinations, supervisory procedures, product disclosure and supervision, and other regulatory matters.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    IM Insights
  • Organization:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo