Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

BIS Removes Vestiges of Cuba’s State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation from the EAR, with Little Practical Impact

By Meredith Rathbone on July 24, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On July 22nd, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) revised the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement the Secretary of State’s May 29, 2015 rescission of Cuba’s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.  While Cuba’s removal from this list is a notable symbolic action, and provides some benefit to non-US companies, it will not significantly change the limitations on the ability of US companies to export to Cuba.  Unless US companies have a license, or rely on a license exception, they will still be prohibited from exporting to Cuba.  For non-US companies that are exporting foreign-origin items containing US-origin content to Cuba, however, this removal of Cuba from the State Sponsor of Terrorism does offer some relief.

Countries designated as State Sponsors of Terrorism are listed in the EAR’s Country Group E:1, and are subject to anti-terrorism (AT) controls.  As a result of Cuba’s “State Sponsors” removal it will no longer be subject to AT controls.  However, the US embargo against Cuba – though now somewhat relaxed – continues to require that any exports by US companies to Cuba be made pursuant to a license or license exception.

Cuba’s removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list also means that it is no longer part of Country Group E:1, and instead is now part of Country Group E:2 – a change that does have some implications.

First, for US-origin items that are incorporated abroad into foreign-origin items, the de minimis threshold will now be 25%, rather than 10%.  For those who are uninitiated in export controls parlance, this means that if a non-US company manufactures items outside of the United States that contain US-origin content, the value of that US-origin content can comprise up to 25% of the value of the non-US origin item without subjecting the foreign-origin item to the jurisdiction of the EAR.  Before Cuba’s removal from the list the percentage was only 10%.  Even with this change, though, certain EAR-controlled items and defense articles controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) are not eligible for de minimis treatment.

In addition – and of note to US companies – exports to Cuba are now eligible for the use of certain license exceptions from which they were previously excluded.  These include exports of certain types of replacement parts and components under License Exception RPL; certain transfers to Cuban nationals for US-government-related transactions under License Exception GOV; carrying certain types of encryption-related commodities, software and technology in personal baggage for personal use under License Exception BAG; and certain activities related to aircraft on temporary sojourn under License Exception AVS.  Certain transactions related to exports lawfully made under the license exceptions noted above would be permitted under the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, which authorize transactions incident to the export of items pursuant to a valid license exception under the EAR, see 31 C.F.R. § 515.533(a).  Other than these limited changes, though, restrictions on exports by US persons to Cuba will remain in place.

Photo of Meredith Rathbone Meredith Rathbone

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms…

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and US sanctions regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Department of State. She regularly assists companies in developing compliance policies, conducting internal investigations, performing training, and conducting due diligence in M&A transactions. She has represented individuals and companies facing civil and criminal investigations in this area, and has also represented clients in their efforts to be removed from OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). She is a frequent writer and speaker on export controls and sanctions topics. She is the co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee, and also serves on the Sanctions Subcommittee of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy.

Read Meredith’s full bio.

Read more about Meredith RathboneEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo