Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

More I-9 Confusion for Employers from Three-Year DACA Card Recall

By Amy L. Peck & Michael H. Neifach on August 3, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

President Barack Obama’s executive order expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) eligibility and work authorization met a another roadblock when a federal District Court threatened to sanction the Secretary of Homeland Security and senior DHS officials for issuing three-year Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). The court previously enjoined implementation of expanded DACA, including issuance of EAD’s valid for three instead of for two.

In May 2015, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began sending letters to the approximately 2,000 three-year EAD recipients instructing them to return the EADs to USCIS and stating that they would be issued a two-year card instead. During the week of July 6, 2015, USCIS sent a second letter to those who had not yet returned the EAD. This letter provided, “USCIS must receive your EAD by July 17, 2015. Failure to return the invalid EAD without good cause may affect your deferred action and employment authorization.” USCIS also indicated that its officers will begin visiting individual homes to retrieve erroneously issued three-year EADs not otherwise returned.

With all the drama surrounding these events, little attention has been given to the effect the recall has on individuals relying on Form I-9 verification using a three-year EAD. Since USCIS has stated that these documents are invalid, the documents cannot be accepted for I-9 verification as a List A document. Employees initially verified using a three-year EAD may present a newly issued two-year EAD. Employers will need to update the existing Form I-9 to reflect this. The government has not yet provided additional guidance to employers as to how this update is to be recorded on Form I-9.

If an employee previously presented an EAD with a three-year expiration date and has not notified you that he or she has a new EAD, you should contact legal counsel.

Photo of Amy L. Peck Amy L. Peck

As co-leader of the firm’s Immigration group, Amy Peck plays a pivotal role in ensuring the group’s attorneys—and the firm—achieve optimal success for employers on any immigration matter. She believes strongly in Jackson Lewis’ collegial culture and sets the tone for a work…

As co-leader of the firm’s Immigration group, Amy Peck plays a pivotal role in ensuring the group’s attorneys—and the firm—achieve optimal success for employers on any immigration matter. She believes strongly in Jackson Lewis’ collegial culture and sets the tone for a work environment that expects, encourages, and celebrates collaboration among not just the practice group, but others across the firm as well.

Amy loves to dive into complex immigration and compliance issues in the workplace, especially those that intersect employment and immigration law. She approaches client service with the understanding that businesses need practical advice that take a 360-degree view. Amy is especially effective when confronted with a difficult and unique problem to solve for a client. In today’s regulatory environment, Amy is aware that every fact has an impact, and a proactive approach is the best protection.

Read more about Amy L. PeckEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Immigration
  • Blog:
    Immigration Blog
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo