Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

A Closer Look At DOD’s Proposed Price Reasonableness Rule

By Covington Team on August 26, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Department of Defense published a long awaited proposed rule on August 3, 2015, amending the DFARS to provide guidance for evaluating the reasonableness of prices using data other than certified cost or pricing data.  The proposed rule falls short of its goal, instead increasing confusion in the determination of price reasonableness for commercial goods that have been “offered for sale” but not sold.  It also adopts open-ended data provisions that arguably permit the agency to request almost unlimited information to substantiate the reasonableness of prices.  This DOD proposed rule is but the latest example of the government considering increasing the burdens and compliance obligations on its commercial contractors while expecting the results to be lower prices.  Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted by October 2, 2015.

If you are interested in more information about this proposed rule and its potential impact, we recently published an article on the subject in Law360.  To view the full Law360 article “A Closer Look At DOD’s Proposed Price Reasonableness Rule” (8/20/2015) please click here.

  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    Inside Government Contracts
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo