Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EPA Revises Rule Governing State Water Quality Standards Review and Approval Process

By Brooks Smith, Patrick Fanning & Andrea Wortzel on September 9, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On August 21, 2015, EPA issued a final rule revising its regulations governing the development, review and approval of state water quality standards (“WQS”) (40 CFR Part 131). The revisions were prompted by requests from the states for increased clarity in the existing rule, as well as the need for greater flexibility.  The rule includes changes that expand EPA’s authority to review state WQS in several ways.

EPA added new provisions allowing it to review state antidegradation policies and related implementation methods for consistency with EPA regulations.  EPA explained how states may apply antidegradation policies – either on a parameter-by-parameter basis or on a water body-by-water body basis.

The rule adds new authority for EPA to review state WQS variances and state-adopted compliance schedules for water quality-based effluent limits in NPDES permits.  Under the final rule, a WQS variance may be adopted for either a discharger-permittee, a water body, or a water body segment. The new rule requires states to certify that WQS variances represent the “highest attainable use,” a newly defined term.

EPA revised its designated use provision to clarify that a state adopting a designated use other than those specified in CWA § 101(a)(2) must submit documentation justifying how the use and value of water for the listed uses supports the states’ designation, such as  a use attainability analysis.

Finally, EPA added new provisions to the regulations which require states that wish to use compliance schedules to adopt a permit compliance schedule provision.  This provision will be subject to EPA review and approval under CWA § 303.  Finally, EPA’s rule requires a state to provide an explanation with its triennial review submittal if it does not adopt new or revised criteria for parameters for which EPA has published new or updated CWA § 304(a) criteria recommendations.

The final rule becomes effective October 20, 2015 and is available here.

Photo of Brooks Smith Brooks Smith

Nationally recognized as a leader in the law, Brooks is involved in cutting-edge environmental and natural resources proceedings in Virginia and around the U.S., including litigation, enforcement defense, project development, and compliance counseling.

Read more about Brooks SmithEmailBrooks's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Andrea Wortzel Andrea Wortzel

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply…

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply issues in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Beyond her water practice, Andrea advises clients on endangered species issues, landfill permitting and compliance, waste permitting, environmental compliance and audit programs and environmental enforcement defense. Andrea also regularly counsels clients on legislative and regulatory strategies to promote her clients’ objectives.

Read more about Andrea WortzelEmailAndrea's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Environmental Law & Policy Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo