Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

No Surprise Here—CFPB Proposes to Significantly Curtail Arbitration Agreements

By Nancy Thomas & James McGuire on October 7, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Today, the CFPB announced its proposals regarding arbitration agreements in consumer financial product contracts. In a move that has plaintiffs’ class action lawyers cheering, the CFPB proposes to require litigation of class claims in court. The CFPB will not ban arbitration of individual actions—at least not yet. Instead, it proposes to require companies to submit claims filed and awards issued for Bureau review and possible publication.

The CFPB’s proposal was issued in conjunction with a field hearing held today in Denver. The proposal states that the CFPB is convening a SBREFA panel, which must provide input within 60 days of convening. The CFPB will then issue its proposed rule for notice and comment. As the CFPB notes in its proposal, the new arbitration rule cannot take effect until at least 180 days after its effective date.

For more background, see our Client Alert on the CFPB’s arbitration study. Stay tuned for in-depth analysis of the CFPB’s proposal.

  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    MoFo ReEnforcement: The Enforcement Blog
  • Organization:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo