Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Warner Chilcott Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud Charges and Pays $125 Million; Several Company Executives Face Individual Liability

By Amandeep S. Sidhu on November 3, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On October 29, 2015, the United States announced a $125 million settlement with a subsidiary of pharmaceutical manufacturer Warner Chilcott to resolve a sealed qui tam in United States ex rel. Alexander, et al. v. Warner Chilcott plc, et al., Civil Action No. 11-CA-1121 (D. Mass.). The global settlement consisted of $22.9 million in criminal fines, $102 million to resolve civil claims, and the company pleading guilty in federal district court in Boston to felony health care fraud charges related to its marketing practices for various osteoporosis treatment medications.  In particular, the United States alleged that Warner Chilcott paid kickbacks to physicians to induce them to prescribe the company’s osteoporosis drugs and engaged in improper billing practices.

Simultaneous with announcing Warner Chilcott’s resolution of the corporate case, the company’s former president, W. Carl Reichel, was arrested on an indictment charging that he conspired to pay kickbacks to physicians. The Reichel indictment describes the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) allegations that Warner Chilcott sales representatives were directed to entertain health care professionals—in part under the auspices of medical education events—in exchange for increased referrals.

With charges against Warner Chilcott’s former president and a physician who allegedly received illegal kickbacks from the company, last week’s announcement invokes the DOJ’s newly minted guidance articulated in the Yates Memorandum. As we reported last month, the Yates Memorandum outlined DOJ’s vow to more closely focus on individuals in civil and criminal corporate investigations. The DOJ is also touting the resolution of this case as a product of its continued coordination with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative.

Photo of Amandeep S. Sidhu Amandeep S. Sidhu

Amandeep (Aman) S. Sidhu focuses his practice on complex commercial disputes with an emphasis on regulated industries, including health care-related investigations and litigation. He represents hospitals and health care companies in investigations and defense of qui tam whistleblower litigation involving federal False Claims…

Amandeep (Aman) S. Sidhu focuses his practice on complex commercial disputes with an emphasis on regulated industries, including health care-related investigations and litigation. He represents hospitals and health care companies in investigations and defense of qui tam whistleblower litigation involving federal False Claims Act (FCA), Stark Laws and Anti-Kickback Statute in federal district courts throughout the United States. Aman regularly supports settlement negotiations with the US Department of Justice for clients in multiple jurisdictions, including negotiation of corporate integrity agreements with the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. Aman also represents health care and life sciences companies in the navigation of state and federal investigations, including responding to congressional inquiries. Aman serves on the Firm’s Diversity/Inclusion Committee, Pro Bono and Community Service Committee and Associate Development Committee. Read Amandeep Sidhu’s full bio.

Read more about Amandeep S. SidhuEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    FCA Update
  • Organization:
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo