Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Contractors Beware: An Overly Broad Confidentiality Agreement Could Cost You!

By Katie Calogero on November 23, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On October 29, 2015, DOD renewed the DFARS deviation implemented in February, which prohibits contracting with entities that require employees or subcontractors to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements that prohibit, or otherwise restrict, such employee or subcontractor from lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or abuse.  Defense contractors should review their policies to ensure they meet the requirements of these new clauses.

Defense contractors and government contracts attorneys already may have noticed the deviation in solicitations issued since February.  The DOD memorandum instructs defense agencies to continue including two DFARS clauses in all future solicitations, including solicitations for the acquisition of commercial items under FAR part 12.

DFARS 252.203-7997 prohibits contractors from requiring employees or subcontractors to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements that prohibit or otherwise restrict the lawful reporting of waste, fraud, or abuse.  If contractors find any provisions in their confidentiality agreements that might be construed as violating this prohibition, these provisions should be removed immediately.  Additionally, this clause requires contractors to notify employees that any restrictions covered by this clause are no longer in effect.  To ensure compliance, contractors explicitly should state that lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or abuse is not prohibited by any internal agreements.

DFARS 252.203-7996 explains that by submitting an offer, the Offeror represents it does not require employees or subcontractors to sign such prohibited agreements.

Noncompliance with these clauses could result in the loss of a contract award in a bid protest, a finding of non-responsibility, receipt of a show cause notice, default termination, and/or potential liability under the False Claims Act for submitting an invoice in violation of the representation.

The deviation currently applies only to defense contractors, but we may see a similar FAR deviation for non-defense contractors soon.  All contractors should review their agreements, employee handbooks, and personnel manuals to ensure there are no problematic provisions.

 

Photo of Katie Calogero Katie Calogero

Katie Calogero is an associate in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Katie CalogeroEmail
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    Government Contracts & Investigations Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo