Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The “Going Dark” problem

By Kathleen Dion on December 2, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

“Going Dark” refers to law enforcement’s lack of technical ability to intercept and access communications and information. In response, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is using a law from the 1700s, the All Writs Act, which grants courts the power to issue “necessary or appropriate” writs to force cellphone manufacturers to assist it in extracting this information.

Two federal courts in New York and California have ordered the phone manufacturers (Apple and an unnamed manufacturer) to provide law enforcement with “reasonable technical assistance.” The New York court left it up to the manufacturer to request a hearing to limit any actions it determines are unreasonably burdensome. The California Court ordered Apple to bypass the cellphone user’s passcode, extract data from the cellphone and copy it to a storage medium. It did not require Apple to attempt to decrypt or otherwise enable law enforcement’s attempts to access any encrypted data.

By contrast, another New York court held that Apple cannot be automatically conscripted in government investigations because it is “a private-sector company that is free to choose to promote its customers’ interest in privacy over the competing interest of law enforcement.” The court requested that Apple advise whether it is capable of unlocking the device, and whether doing so would be unreasonably burdensome. Apple responded that, generally, for devices running a version of iOS 7, it can extract certain user-generated active files, but it cannot extract email, calendar entries, or any third-party app data. It noted, though, that aside from the technical burden to unlock the device, Apple may suffer other burdens including, reputation harm and requirements that its employees testify in the instance of criminal prosecution. The case is still pending.

Apple has warned that law enforcement requests soon will be impossible to perform, because Apple lacks the technical ability to unlock devices running iOS 8 or higher.

Photo of Kathleen Dion Kathleen Dion

Kate Dion’s practice includes all aspects of civil and criminal litigation. She represents clients in complex commercial litigation, including allegations of patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair trade practices, tortious interference with business relations, and other business torts. Her…

Kate Dion’s practice includes all aspects of civil and criminal litigation. She represents clients in complex commercial litigation, including allegations of patent infringement, breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair trade practices, tortious interference with business relations, and other business torts. Her experience also includes counseling clients in government investigations, internal investigations, and white-collar criminal matters. In addition, she represents institutional clients and individuals in probate litigation. Read her rc.com bio here.

Read more about Kathleen DionEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo