Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Clean Power Plan Will Stay in Effect Pending the Outcome of Litigation

By Jane E. Montgomery & Amy Antoniolli on January 22, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Tehachapi Pass Wind Farm

The D.C. Circuit denied industry petitioners’ motions to stay the effectiveness of the Clean Power Plan on Jan. 21. In a two-page order, the court found the petitioners had not satisfied the requirements for a stay pending review and issued an expedited case schedule.

The order asked parties to submit a format for briefing as well as a schedule by Jan. 27, 2016 that ensures that all briefing will be complete by April 22, 2016. Parties will debate whether the cost of implementing the rule is too great and whether EPA has exceeded the bounds of its authority, among numerous other issues. Oral arguments are scheduled to begin June 2, 2016 and continue to June 3 if necessary. This schedule could allow for a court decision before initial state plans are due in September 2016.

This decision means that states and power plants subject to this rule must take immediate steps towards complying with the Clean Power Plan in order for initial state plans to be submitted to EPA as required in early September 2016. The controversy is expected quickly to move from the federal level to the state level.

The Clean Power Plan is the Obama Administration’s landmark rule that will require states to implement measures to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the power sector. Carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced through the implementation of a number of measures, including deployment of solar, wind, nuclear and similar non-CO2 emitting technologies, and by changing consumer use of energy through energy efficiency programs. The Clean Power Plan is being challenged by more than half of the states as well as numerous power entities, and is likewise supported by a large number of states and other entities.

Please consult a member of the Schiff Hardin Environmental Group for more information.

Photo of Jane E. Montgomery Jane E. Montgomery

Jane brings an in-depth understanding of the dynamic legal landscape governing the use of air, water, and land. She has extensive experience representing energy companies, developers, lenders, and manufacturing companies in a broad range of environmental matters, and regularly counsels clients on day-to-day…

Jane brings an in-depth understanding of the dynamic legal landscape governing the use of air, water, and land. She has extensive experience representing energy companies, developers, lenders, and manufacturing companies in a broad range of environmental matters, and regularly counsels clients on day-to-day compliance issues.

Read more about Jane E. MontgomeryEmailJane's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Amy Antoniolli Amy Antoniolli

Amy Antoniolli is an environmental lawyer with broad experience in administrative and enforcement-related issues. She advises clients on compliance with the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, CERCLA, and the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. She also works on property remediation projects pursued…

Amy Antoniolli is an environmental lawyer with broad experience in administrative and enforcement-related issues. She advises clients on compliance with the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, CERCLA, and the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. She also works on property remediation projects pursued under state and federal cleanup programs. She advises renewable energy clients as well, reviewing siting and operating requirements for wind and waste to energy facilities.

Read more about Amy AntoniolliEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Energy & Environmental Law Adviser
  • Organization:
    ArentFox Schiff LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo