Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Ballot Initiative Disclosure

By Ronald M. Jacobs & Cristina I. Vessels on March 22, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Long before Citizens United allowed corporations to fund independent expenditures to support candidates, the Supreme Court allowed corporations to contribute to ballot measure committees. Until recently, disclosure was a fairly straightforward matter: give to the official committees supporting or opposing the measure and the contribution would be disclosed; give to other entities (like a nonprofit) that give to the official committees, and the corporation’s contribution would not be disclosed. After Citizens United, however, states’ fear of corporate involvement in candidate races led many states to require disclosure of “upstream” contributions. Those changes often applied not only to contributions for candidate independent expenditures, but also to contributions for ballot measures.

We have written about California before. Recently, Washington State has focused on the intermediary issue of when a nonprofit must disclose its donors. A trial court in Washington State ruled that a trade association should have registered itself as a ballot measure committee based on a special project it undertook to challenge state initiatives about food labeling. The result of this decision is that member companies had to disclose their contributions to the association for the special project.

On the flip side, the complexity of ballot measure rules has swept even small efforts to support or oppose into complicated registration and reporting rules. There have been several challenges to these rules, and the courts are coming out in different places:

Red XThe Tenth Circuit struck down registration and reporting requirements in Colorado as they applied to a small issue group that raised only about $3,500 to advocate against a state-wide ballot measure in 2014. The court did not say the statute was unconstitutional in all applications, just that the Secretary of State could not enforce the rules against such a small group because the disclosure regulations were so burdensome.

GreenCheckThe Fifth Circuit took a different approach and upheld a similar law that required registration and reporting for groups that raise just $200. The court there said that getting together with friends and neighbors with the intention of placing an ad in a local paper and handing out flyers opposing a ballot initiative was subject to registration and reporting. The plaintiffs have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to consider their challenge.

The bottom line: if you plan to contribute to a ballot measure committee, be prepared to have your name disclosed. Even if you are contributing through a trade association or other nonprofit, many states will require disclosure. Although disclosure thresholds vary and the courts have not taken a uniform approach to ballot committee contributions, these decisions are limited and not likely to apply to large ballot measure committees that are well funded and capable of handling disclosure obligations.

Photo of Ronald M. Jacobs Ronald M. Jacobs

Ron Jacobs focuses his practice on political law, nonprofit organizations, and crisis management, including congressional investigations, class actions, and regulatory investigations. Ron founded and co-chairs the firm’s nationally recognized Political Law practice. He advises clients on all aspects of state and federal political…

Ron Jacobs focuses his practice on political law, nonprofit organizations, and crisis management, including congressional investigations, class actions, and regulatory investigations. Ron founded and co-chairs the firm’s nationally recognized Political Law practice. He advises clients on all aspects of state and federal political law, including campaign finance, lobbying disclosure, gift and ethics rules, pay-to-play laws, and tax implications of political activities.

Read more about Ronald M. JacobsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Political Law Briefing
  • Organization:
    Venable LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo