Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

DOJ Amping Up FCPA Prosecution Efforts While Offering New Cooperation Benefits

By Aviva Gilbert on April 7, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Department of Justice’s white collar and fraud sections have been focused on domestic issues as of late, and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prosecutions fell out of the limelight. Lest any corporation or defense counsel get too comfortable in that assumption, however, the DOJ issued a new guidance memo circling back to the FCPA and announcing a number of changes that signal a renewed focus on FCPA violations – and an increased focus on settlement.

The DOJ announced new hires in the Fraud Section’s FCPA ranks, and noted that the FBI is on board as well, having added “three new squads” of agents dedicated to FCPA investigation work. This ramp up on the FBI’s part shows how labor intensive FCPA investigations are for the government – and signals that the DOJ will continue to rely on corporations’ own investigative and preventative efforts in working to prevent and stop bribery and other FCPA problems.

In that vein, the new guidance memo announced a yearlong pilot project to reward companies’ self-reporting efforts. Companies that investigate and voluntarily disclose conduct potential violative of the FCPA – and name individual names – will see well below guidelines fine recommendations from the government. The memo details all the requirements for obtaining cooperation credit, and it is a long list. Documents, details, names, translated files and more must be handed over to the DOJ. The agency is clearly supplementing its own prosecutorial efforts by giving companies incentives to do the investigative work in house, and pass on the information to Washington.

For those that do self disclose, the memo suggests 50% off the low end of guidelines range may be a reasonable expected penalty. Any profits derived from the conduct also must be disgorged. We suspect this will be a contentious calculation process, and one that counsel should navigate carefully. The benefits also hinge on companies’ developing their own remediation programs – an important (and expensive) element of the DOJ’s new pilot program. It remains to be seen whether companies will actually elect to increase investigation and self disclose, but more clarity and specifics on the benefits of disclosure are a good thing in our book.

Photo of Aviva Gilbert Aviva Gilbert

Aviva Gilbert represents companies and individuals when interacting with the government at the state or federal level. She helps shepherd clients through all stages of investigations, enforcement actions, and criminal cases, prepares them for depositions and interviews, and negotiates favorable outcomes.

Read more about Aviva GilbertEmailAviva's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    The Compliance Gap
  • Organization:
    Farella Braun + Martel LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo