Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Panama “Waked” Up to Painful New Money Laundering Sanctions

By Peter Jeydel on May 9, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The new US sanctions announced on May 5, 2016 against the Waked Money Laundering Organization (MLO) pile on the pain and humiliation for Panama, coming just a few weeks after the Panama Papers scandal broke.  This development may start to raise serious questions in the international financial community about Panama’s ability to control financial crime in its trade and financial industries, two sectors that are critical to its economy.

Notably, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which imposed the sanctions, stated in its announcement that “the Panamanian authorities have been informed of this designation and Panamanian and US authorities will coordinate going forward.”  Translation: OFAC and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) acted unilaterally here, presumably because the Panamanian government was viewed as an unreliable partner.  If the Panamanians are not able to get their house in order fairly quickly, and depending on what additional details emerge from the Panama Papers leak, further financial sector restrictions could be in store.

This OFAC action names the Waked MLO and its leaders, Panamanian-Colombian-Spanish national Nidal Ahmed Waked Hatum and Panamanian-Lebanese-Colombian national Abdul Mohamed Waked Fares, as Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers (SDNTs) under the Kingpin Act.  It similarly designates six of their alleged “associates” and 68 companies alleged to be “tied to” the network, including a Panamanian bank, Balboa Bank & Trust.  OFAC states that the Waked MLO used trade-based money laundering schemes – including false invoicing, duty-free retail, real estate development, and financial services – along with bulk cash smuggling and other methods, “to launder drug proceeds on behalf of multiple international drug traffickers and their organizations.”  These sanctions prohibit US persons from dealing with the listed persons and entities and require that all of their property with US jurisdiction or in the control of US persons be frozen.  That includes any entity of which they or any other SDN owns 50% or more.

It is noteworthy that OFAC designated two of the network’s attorneys in the wake of the Panama Papers revelations, which involved Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca.  OFAC alleged that the attorneys helped Waked incorporate shell companies and served as nominees for these entities, not unlike what Mossack Fonseca has been accused of doing.  This will likely add to the speculation about whether sanctions could be in the cards for Mossack Fonseca as well.

Along with the sanctions, OFAC issued general licenses to allow parties to wind down their business with Soho Mall Panama‎, a luxury mall in downtown Panama City, and entities tied to the Millennium Plaza hotel.  It also issued a general license to allow two Panamanian newspapers, La Estrella and El Siglo, which are owned by one of the sanctioned companies, to continue operating by authorizing US persons to engage in certain transactions that otherwise would be prohibited due to the new designations.

Photo of Peter Jeydel Peter Jeydel

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)…

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the State Department. His practice spans all aspects of these regimes, including counseling, compliance, transactional advice, licensing and opinions, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has also represented companies and individuals seeking de-listing from OFAC’s sanctions list. In addition, Pete has assisted clients in anti-corruption matters, including under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and has experience handling reviews and investigations by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Read Pete’s full bio.

Read more about Peter JeydelEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo