Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Medicare Makes Changes to the Shared Savings Program to Strengthen Incentives for ACO Care Coordination

By Sheppard Mullin & Ethan Stanislawski on June 8, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 6th, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a final rule shifting how Medicare pays Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.  CMS said the final rule aims to help more ACOs participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program by improving the payment methodology and providing them with a new participation option to move into the more advanced tracks of the program. Under the final rule, Medicare will factor ACOs’ ability to deliver higher-quality care at lower cost relative to other local providers in ACOs’ reimbursements. Prior to the final rule, CMS based payment on the evaluation of an ACO’s past performance.

Regarding the changes, CMS Acting Administrator Andy Slavitt said they will “encourage more physicians to improve patient care by joining ACOs, while also refining how the program measures success, so that current participants are better rewarded for quality.”  Mr. Slavitt said the changes will also help physicians prepare for the new Quality Payment Program, which will hold providers to unprecedented levels of accountability not just for reporting, but also, among large physician groups, for their performance on a broad range of behaviors.

The agency will release yearly data reports on county-level risk scores and expenditures as well as ACO-specific data for the same counties, according to a CMS fact sheet. CMS will also develop an option for ACOs in the first track to extend their participation for another year under the same terms before taking on more financial risk under the more advanced tracks.

The agency said the changes will help build on the progress ACOs made in 2014, when they generated $411 million in total savings but few qualified for bonuses. “Today’s changes build on that progress, so that more patients benefit from coordinated care and Medicare pays for what works to help doctors, nurses, and other clinicians focus on the quality of care, not the quantity of services,” Slavitt said in the announcement. The changes are also part of Medicare’s broader strategy to “improve the healthcare system by paying providers for what works, unlocking healthcare data, and finding new ways to coordinate and integrate care to improve quality.”

Photo of Ethan Stanislawski Ethan Stanislawski

Ethan is Director of Customer Success at LexBlog managing day-to-day operations of a small team, as well as overseeing the long-term vision of all customer-facing interactions. He works with clients at all stages of a blog’s creation, from launch to any issues that…

Ethan is Director of Customer Success at LexBlog managing day-to-day operations of a small team, as well as overseeing the long-term vision of all customer-facing interactions. He works with clients at all stages of a blog’s creation, from launch to any issues that may arise in the future. Ethan brings over nine years of experience in Customer Support and Customer Success at major tech companies and startups alike. He’s helped create and overhaul support operations for Hulu, FOX, and Flipagram. After obtaining a Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Chicago, he did graduate work in journalism at Indiana University, and his writing credits include The Village Voice, Vulture, and Prefix Magazine.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo