Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Massachusetts Company Hit with ITAR Penalty for a Single Individual Deemed Export Violation; Settlement Highlights Importance of Timely Disclosure

By Peter Jeydel on June 27, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In its second enforcement action this year, on June 20th, the State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) reached a $100,000 settlement with Massachusetts-based Microwave Engineering Corporation.  Despite the small penalty amount, this case is noteworthy in several respects.  First, there was only one type of violation – over a period of six months the company allowed a single Chinese research scientist to gain unauthorized access to ITAR-controlled technical data related to Category XI(b) antennae.  Typically, DDTC consent agreements involve more systemic violations.  Second, while the company voluntarily disclosed the violation and cooperated with DDTC, the company failed to report the infraction in a timely manner – given that the deemed export involved a proscribed country national. According to ITAR section 126.1, any unauthorized export involving a proscribed country or national is to be promptly reported to DDTC. The company took almost two years after discovering the issue to disclose it to the government.  Third, the company’s President was personally involved in the violation, repeatedly providing the Chinese employee with ITAR-controlled technical data without DDTC authorization.  The company’s President also pleaded guilty to an unrelated criminal violation of the ITAR on the same day that the company submitted its voluntary disclosure.  DDTC and other law enforcement agencies were already closely examining this company as part of that criminal case, which involved a conspiracy to export controlled items to Singapore, to a company that was separately charged in connection with the export of items to Iran later found in IEDs in Iraq.  While this case does involve several unique circumstances, in particular the company’s President being involved in an unrelated conspiracy to violate the ITAR, it still presents an important message that even isolated violations can lead to major problems with DDTC if not promptly disclosed with adequate remedial steps.

Photo of Peter Jeydel Peter Jeydel

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)…

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the State Department. His practice spans all aspects of these regimes, including counseling, compliance, transactional advice, licensing and opinions, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has also represented companies and individuals seeking de-listing from OFAC’s sanctions list. In addition, Pete has assisted clients in anti-corruption matters, including under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and has experience handling reviews and investigations by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Read Pete’s full bio.

Read more about Peter JeydelEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo