Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Dirty Dancing with Trademark Rights: How Pop Culture References in Ads Can Raise Legal Issues

By Melissa Turcios & Mitchell Stabbe on July 25, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Prospective advertisers come to your station and describe their ideas for local ads. A realtor’s ad ends with “There’s no place like home.” A boat builder says he will tell buyers, “You’re going to need a bigger boat.” And, a used car salesperson wants to say “I’m gonna make you an offer you can’t refuse.” These are pretty clever and, after all, they are everyday catchphrases, right?

Just don’t do it.

Advertising campaigns can be a source of legal liability for broadcasters when they merely allude to famous creative content that is protected under intellectual property laws. The recent decision in Lion’s Gate Entertainment, Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Services Company, Inc. demonstrates how broadcasters that publish ads containing pop culture references can run afoul of trademark rights and other legal issues.

Many lists of most famous movie quotes include “Nobody puts baby in the corner,” spoken by Patrick Swayze to Jennifer Grey in the Oscar-winning 1987 film, “Dirty Dancing.” The line precedes the final dance scene, culminating in the iconic image of Swayze lifting Grey above his head.

Almost thirty years after the film’s release, TD Ameritrade ran a national advertising campaign with the tagline “Nobody puts your old 401(k) in the corner.” The accompanying visual featured a man performing a dance lift with a piggy bank, sometimes to the score of “(I’ve Had) the Time of My Life.” Lion’s Gate Entertainment, the copyright holder of “Dirty Dancing” and the owner of the trademark NOBODY PUTS BABY IN THE CORNER®, which is registered for various types of merchandise (but not for entertainment or advertising services), sent a cease-and-desist letter to TD Ameritrade. Although TD Ameritrade agreed to stop running the ads, it refused to pay Lion’s Gate for its claimed damages for the alleged copyright and trademark infringement. When settlement discussions between the two parties fell through, Lion’s Gate sued TD Ameritrade and the advertising firm that created the campaign, Havas Worldwide New York.

Widely known phrases like “Nobody puts baby in the corner” can become so identified with particular providers of goods or services that they can function in the consumer’s mind as de facto trademarks. Even if the providers never register them, federal and state laws may recognize and protect them as “common law” marks. Advertising slogans, sports cheers and celebrity catchphrases have all been registered, licensed and litigated over the years, so it is unsurprising that Lion’s Gate would assert that it has a trademark interest in its iconic movie quote.

These kinds of claims are often brought by recognizable companies and public figures on the ground that consumers may interpret the use of their catchphrase as an endorsement of the alleged infringer’s goods or services. And, safeguarding goodwill and preventing consumer deception by keeping the marketplace clear of confusingly similar branding or ads is the whole point of trademark law.

Trademark infringement is just one of the many legal issues that arise when someone like TD Ameritrade attempts to drop pop cultural references in its products, services, or ads. For example, Clara Peller, the actress who boldly asked, “Where’s the beef?” was fired from Wendy’s for violating her non-compete agreement when she later answered, “I found it, I really found it. Boy, did I find it!” in a Prego’s spaghetti sauce ad. Other disputes involving popular phrases have been more traditional:

  • After wrangling with the NFL and the New Orleans Saints regarding trademark rights over WHO DAT?®, Who Dat, Inc., the phrase’s registered trademark holder, triumphed and now aggressively protects its rights against unlicensed vendors appropriating the cheer for their wares.
  • Michael Buffer says that he has earned more than $400 million from licensing and enforcing his rights over his trademarked catchphrase LET’S GET READY TO RUMBLE® – he is also a particularly aggressive trademark owner against advertisers, as well as against broadcasters who have used an audio clip of him in programming.
  • When Hallmark used Paris Hilton’s image and registered THAT’S HOT® mark in a greeting card, they also received a cease-and-desist letter, alleging, among other things, a violation of Hilton’s right of publicity and trademark infringement. Hilton’s case was ultimately litigated all the way to the Ninth Circuit before it was eventually settled out-of-court.

In the “Dirty Dancing” case, Lion’s Gate’s trademark claims were dismissed because the Court of Appeals found them to be too similar to its copyright claims. However, the defendants’ woes are not yet over; TD Ameritrade and its ad agency must still contend with the ongoing copyright and unfair competition issues arising out of the same ad campaign. And, of course, even if they ultimately prevail on all the claims, they will have incurred substantial legal fees.

Broadcasters may have limited liability if they merely air someone’s advertising that infringes a trademark, but not if they assist their client in creating the advertisement. And, they are open to copyright infringement claims based on advertising that they carry. Problems of this nature can be avoided if the advertiser (or broadcaster) obtains a license from the trademark owner. Otherwise, broadcasters will be assuming an unnecessary risk, especially if they are at all involved in creating the advertising.

Ultimately, the Lion’s Gate decision serves as a reminder to carefully review any advertising or promotional materials (whether for broadcast or for social media feeds or websites) to make sure that they don’t incorporate popular phrases that may ultimately get you into legal hot water. Consulting your intellectual property counsel before investing significant resources into a public advertising campaign that can expose you to legal risk can actually save you time, money, and heartache in the long run.

If you don’t … may the Force be with you.

 

Melissa Turcios

Melissa Turcios advises wireless and cable service providers, communications industry trade associations, media companies, and others regarding regulatory, legislative, and compliance issues. Ms. Turcios joined Wilkinson Barker Knauer in 2016, after working as a field organizer in key democratic primary states for a…

Melissa Turcios advises wireless and cable service providers, communications industry trade associations, media companies, and others regarding regulatory, legislative, and compliance issues. Ms. Turcios joined Wilkinson Barker Knauer in 2016, after working as a field organizer in key democratic primary states for a presidential campaign. Prior to that, she was a law clerk for the Honorable Thomas C. Miller, presiding judge of the civil division in the New Jersey Superior Court, where she focused on complex civil litigation and administrative appeals.

While in law school, Ms. Turcios served on the Editorial Board for Duke Law and Technology Review and the Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law.  Her legal experience also includes internships with the National Academies of Sciences, where she contributed research and content to reports on privacy and data citation, and the Texas Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts, where she counseled clients on intellectual property protection, corporate formation, and employment issues. Additionally, while a visiting student at Rutgers University School of Law, Ms. Turcios participated in the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot Court.  Before law school, Ms. Turcios worked in the media industry for various national publications.

Read more about Melissa TurciosEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Mitchell Stabbe Mitchell Stabbe

Mitchell Stabbe has over thirty years of experience in virtually all aspects of trademark law. Over the course of his career, Mitch has experienced numerous changes in trademark law and in technology, with the former often several steps behind the latter. Today, his…

Mitchell Stabbe has over thirty years of experience in virtually all aspects of trademark law. Over the course of his career, Mitch has experienced numerous changes in trademark law and in technology, with the former often several steps behind the latter. Today, his practice focuses on the ever-evolving interplay between trademarks and the Internet. Over the last few years, for example, Mitch has regularly advised clients and provided comments to ICANN concerning the roll-out of hundreds of new generic top level domains (gTLDs) and the protections available to brand owners against cybersquatting and other domain name abuses.

Mitch also counsels clients on the availability and registration of trademarks and service marks and has prosecuted over a thousand applications before the US Patent and Trademark Office. He also is experienced in drafting and negotiating contracts, licenses, assignments and security interests involving intellectual property rights.

Mitch has litigated numerous trademark and copyright infringement and unfair competition civil actions in federal court, including actions against infringers and gray market importers, as well as adversary proceedings in federal court and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). In addition, he has successfully prosecuted over fifty claims under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) to compel the transfer of domain names registered in bad faith.

He has represented companies from a wide array of industries, including communications, media, publishing, technology, education, not-for-profit associations, real estate leasing, banking, and premium cigars.

Read more about Mitchell StabbeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    Broadcast Law Blog
  • Organization:
    David Oxenford, Esq
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo