Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EPA Denies Petitions to Review Startup and Shutdown Issues under MATS and Utility NSPS

By Patrick F. Veasy on August 9, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
gavel

On August 5, 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) denied two petitions by environmental and industry groups to reconsider startup and shutdown issues under the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule and the Utility New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). These regulations, finalized in February 2012, impose operational requirements to minimize emissions during periods of start-up and shutdown in lieu of numeric limits. The environmental groups argued that numeric limits should apply during these periods and they did not have the opportunity to adequately comment on this issue. EPA denied the environmental groups’ petition arguing the groups had adequate opportunity to submit comments during earlier rulemaking proceedings.

As we have previously reported, EPA’s MATS rule is the subject of ongoing litigation. EPA’s treatment of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) periods within state implementation plans is also the subject of developments and an ongoing legal challenge.

Please contact any member of the Schiff Hardin Environmental Group with questions about EPA’s MATS rule or SSM policy.

  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Blog:
    Energy & Environmental Law Adviser
  • Organization:
    ArentFox Schiff LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo