Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

HHS Designates Cloud Service Providers as Business Associates Under HIPAA

By Odia Kagan, James B. MacDonald II, Roshni Patel & Philip N. Yannella on November 4, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Cloud service providers that process electronic protected health information (ePHI) are business associates under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), even if the PHI is encrypted and the cloud service provider is not able to view it. This unequivocal determination, made in recent guidance by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) on HIPAA and Cloud Computing, puts an end to continued speculation on this subject.

The guidance clarifies that a cloud service provider (CSP) that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits ePHI on behalf of a HIPAA-covered entity or as a subcontractor for a covered entity’s business associate is itself a business associate under HIPAA. Thus, HHS states that the relationship between the CSP and its customer must be governed by a business associate agreement (BAA) in order to comply with the regulations implementing HIPAA (HIPAA Rules). The CSP is directly required to comply with the privacy and data security obligations set forth in the HIPAA Rules.

A CSP constitutes a business associate, even if the CSP cannot view the ePHI because it is encrypted and lacks the decryption key. This is referred to as a “no view” service. Therefore, HHS states that even covered entities or business associates that engage CSPs that provide a “no view” service must enter into a HIPAA-compliant BAA with the CSPs.

If a covered entity or business associate determines that a BAA is required for a preexisting CSP relationship, it should rectify the situation by promptly entering into a BAA.

CSPs must comply with HIPAA obligations. These include:

  • Breach notification. A CSP is directly liable under HIPAA if it uses or discloses PHI in a manner not authorized by its contract, required by law, or permitted under HIPAA. Under the HIPAA Rules, the CSP must notify its customer if it discovers a breach of unsecured PHI.
  • Availability. A CSP must ensure that ePHI is not corrupted by malware and that ePHI remains available in disaster situations. It also must make the PHI available to the customer so that the customer would be able to provide its customers with the ability to access and amend their information.
  • Destruction of PHI. A CSP must return or destroy any PHI in their possession at the end of the effective term of a BAA, where feasible.

While CSPs providing “no view” services are also directly liable for meeting the terms of the BAA and directly liable for compliance with applicable HIPAA requirements, in practice their compliance with the HIPAA requirements may necessitate fewer actions that that of CSP that have access to the information. For example, a “no view” CSP must formally comply with Breach Notification Rule. However, if the affected ePHI it is processing is encrypted according to HHS standards, the incident may fall within a “safe harbor” and the CSP would not be required to report the incident to its customer.

However, encryption does not meet all requirements of the HIPAA security rule and CSPs must implement other measures such as administrative safeguards to maintain the confidentiality of ePHI and physical safeguards for systems and servers that house the ePHI.

The OCR has already engaged in enforcement actions relating to CSPs providing services without a BAA. In the case of Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), the OCR entered into a settlement which a monetary payment by OHSU to the Department for $2.7 million. Among the HIPAA violations included in the settlement was the storage of the ePHI of more than 3,000 individuals on a cloud-based server without a business associate agreement.

Entities working with CSPs or who are looking to engage CSPs should:

  • Understand the cloud computing environment or solution offered by a particular CSP;
  • Conduct their own analysis to identify and assess potential threats and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all ePHI they create;
  • Conduct a risk assessment to ensure that the CSPs are capable of protecting the PHI entrusted to them in a manner compliant with HIPAA; and
  • Set out contractual provisions obligating the CSP to abide by these protective measures in a BAA and/or in a separate cloud services agreement.

Ballard Spahr’s Privacy and Data Security Group provides a full range of counseling, transactional, regulatory, investigative, and litigation services across industry sectors. Our cross-disciplinary team of attorneys helps clients around the world mitigate cyber risk, investigate, and respond to cyber incidents, and navigate post-incident enforcement, compliance, and litigation risk.

Ballard Spahr’s Health Care Group provides counsel on regulatory, compliance, transactional, financing, benefits and compensation, and labor and employment matters. Our HIPAA/HITECH team represents health care providers, health plans, and business associates in implementing HIPAA/HITECH compliance programs, undertaking data security assessments, preparing breach response plans, conducting breach assessments and notifications, and advising on the use of data for research, marketing, and other purposes.

Ballard Spahr’s Life Sciences and Technology Group counsels frontline businesses engaged in innovation, development, and commercialization activities, and the institutions that support them, through contract research, data mining, analytical and product development, formulation, and production.

Philip N. Yannella

yannellap@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8180 | view full bio

As Practice Leader of Ballard Spahr’s Privacy and Data Security Group, and Practice Leader of the firm’s E-Discovery and Data Management Group, Philip N. Yannella provides clients with 360-degree advice on the transfer, storage, and use…

yannellap@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8180 | view full bio

As Practice Leader of Ballard Spahr’s Privacy and Data Security Group, and Practice Leader of the firm’s E-Discovery and Data Management Group, Philip N. Yannella provides clients with 360-degree advice on the transfer, storage, and use of digital information.

Phil regularly advises clients on the Stored Communications Act (SCA), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), EU-US Privacy Shield, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Defense of Trade Secrets Act, PCI-DSS, Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulations, ISO 27001 compliance, HIPAA Security Rules, and FTC enforcement activity, as well as eDiscovery issues—leveraging his experience serving as National Discovery Counsel for more than two dozen companies in nationwide litigation. He harnesses his deep knowledge of privacy, data security, and information governance laws to help multinational companies develop global information governance programs to comply with overlapping, and sometimes conflicting, laws. Phil serves on the advisory board for the ACC Foundation’s Cybersecurity Survey, the largest survey of in-house counsel on cybersecurity issues.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Health Care Reform Dashboard
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo