Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

FinCEN Opens 2017 with SAR Sharing Guidance for Casinos

By Jeffrey M. Hanna, Matthew Orso & Patrick Rowan on January 9, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

top secret

Financial institutions’ ability to share suspicious activity reports (“SARs”) within the corporate organizational structure serves as an important tool for Bank Secrecy Act compliance and risk avoidance.  FinCEN began 2017 by reminding casinos of their ability to share information under this rule.

Subject to certain limitations, casinos may share with domestic parents and affiliates suspicious activity reports and related information under the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”).  FIN-2017-G001 (January 4, 2017).  Under this guidance, such sharing assists casinos in discharging their responsibilities with respect to enterprise-wide risk management and compliance, and facilitates a casino’s ability to identify suspicious transactions.  This guidance also reinforces FinCEN’s 2014 Advisory to financial institutions regarding promoting a culture of compliance, which is achieved in part by ensuring information is shared throughout the organization.  FIN-2014-A007.

Permissible Sharing

Casinos are expressly permitted to disclose SARs to FinCEN, law enforcement agencies, and Federal and state regulators or tribal authorities that examine casinos for compliance with the BSA.  31 CFR § 1021.320(e).  Casinos may also share facts and documents upon which a SAR is based with another financial institution for filing a joint SAR, § 1021.320(e)(1)(ii)(A)(2), and share a SAR or information revealing the existence of a SAR “within a casino’s corporate organizational structure for purposes consistent with Title II of the [BSA] as determined by regulations or in guidance.”  § 320(e)(1)(ii)(B).

With this guidance, FinCEN defines the “corporate organizational structure.”  A “parent” is as an entity that controls the casino filing the SAR; an “affiliate” is a financial institution required under BSA rules to report suspicious transactions that is controlled by, or under common control with, the casino filing the SAR.

Important Limitations on Sharing

Casinos and their agents are not authorized to disclose a SAR or any information that would reveal the existence of a SAR to anyone outside a limited set of exceptions, described above.  Under no circumstances may this information be shared with a subject of a SAR.  In addition, casinos may not share SARs or revealing information with:

  1. Parents or affiliates located outside the U.S.;
  1. Individuals or entities within the organization structure who perform functions unrelated to gaming, g. shops, restaurants, entertainment;
  1. A financial institution without its own independent SAR-filing obligation; or
  1. A money services business co-located with a casino but not an affiliate.

Further, a domestic parent or affiliate receiving SAR-related information from a casino may not forward that information to another affiliate, even if that affiliate is subject to SAR-reporting obligations.

Practical Impact

In formulating its overall compliance program, a casino should be mindful of its ability to share this SAR information to effectively identify risk and ensure operational information is understood by those in a position to mitigate identified risks.  However, given the prohibitions on SAR information sharing—and potential attendant liability—casinos should be mindful to have policies, procedures and internal controls in place to ensure SAR confidentiality is preserved.

Photo of Jeffrey M. Hanna Jeffrey M. Hanna

Jeff’s practice includes complex litigation at the trial and appellate level, focusing on matters arising from government, regulatory, and criminal and corporate internal investigations.

Read more about Jeffrey M. HannaEmail
Photo of Matthew Orso Matthew Orso

Matt is co-chair of the Bank Defense & Counseling team for the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation Department. He defends companies and individuals facing government investigations and helps them navigate these inquiries to resolution.

Read more about Matthew OrsoEmail
Photo of Patrick Rowan Patrick Rowan

Pat’s practice focuses on criminal and civil enforcement proceedings and internal investigations. He has substantial experience in federal law enforcement, as well as international and national security matters. He also advises corporate clients on compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the ITAR…

Pat’s practice focuses on criminal and civil enforcement proceedings and internal investigations. He has substantial experience in federal law enforcement, as well as international and national security matters. He also advises corporate clients on compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the ITAR, the EAR and OFAC regulations.

Read more about Patrick RowanEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate Compliance, International
  • Blog:
    Subject to Inquiry
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Innocelf Knowledge
  • Labor & Employment Blog
  • Morea Law Blog
  • Privacy World
  • Known Trends
Copyright © 2023, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo