Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

2016 Year in Review: FinCEN Enforcement Actions in Gaming Focus on Culture of Compliance

By Peter D. Hardy on January 29, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Because the gaming industry has been known to attract some bad actors who attempt to use its financial services to conceal or transfer illicit wealth, AML compliance remains a key concern in this growing business sector.

Three significant 2016 enforcement actions emphasized that the gaming industry is particularly relevant to FinCEN’s focus on the importance of cultivating a culture of robust AML/BSA compliance within financial institutions. These enforcement actions also suggest that some segments of the gaming industry are still in the process of attaining a fully mature AML compliance culture.

  • Cantor Gaming: On October 3, 2016, FinCEN assessed a $12 million civil penalty against Cantor Gaming for alleged “egregious and systemic” violations of the program, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements of the BSA. In particular, FinCEN alleged that Cantor failed to: provide sufficient AML training for its officers and employees; use all available information to detect and report suspicious transactions; and maintain sufficient internal controls to detect ongoing criminal activity by its Director of Risk Management and Vice President and his co-conspirators. “When greed clouds judgment within the leadership of an organization, and when even explicit warnings are ignored, it is a sign that the organization’s compliance culture is damaged or nonexistent,” FinCEN Acting Director Jamal El-Hindi remarked in a press release about the settlement.
  • Hawaiian Gardens Casino: On July 15, 2016, FinCEN assessed a $2.8 million civil penalty against card club Hawaiian Gardens Casino for repeated alleged BSA violations, including failure to implement and maintain an effective AML program and failure to comply with BSA reporting and recordkeeping requirements. FinCEN specifically attributed these failures to Hawaiian Gardens’ lack of compliance culture, stating that “leadership at [the card club] did not take an active role as it should have in promoting a strong culture of compliance.” FinCEN noted that: the club’s BSA committee, which included casino management, failed to meet as required by its charter; its leadership did not review and approve its risk assessment; and its management failed to establish policies and procedures regarding customer identification. FinCEN also criticized Hawaiian Gardens’ failure to take corrective action in response to findings of significant BSA violations by both the IRS and the card club’s own independent consultant, allowing violations to go uncorrected for years.
  • Sparks Nugget: On April 5, 2016, FinCEN assessed a $1 million civil penalty against Sparks Nugget, Inc., relating to its alleged willful and repeated violations of the program, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements of the BSA. In particular, FinCEN alleged that Sparks Nugget had systemic compliance failures, a poor compliance culture, and “a blatant disregard for AML compliance that permeated all levels of [the casino].” FinCEN said Sparks Nugget: “chose not to file rightfully prepared [SARs];” had a committee to determine whether to file SARs that never met and several of whose putative members did not know that they were on the committee; and ordered its compliance manager not to interact with BSA examiners. FinCEN also criticized the casino for failing to use the information it gathered about customers to ensure BSA compliance, and instead only used it to further business interests.

If you would like to remain updated on these issues, please click here to subscribe to Money Laundering Watch.

Peter D. Hardy

hardyp@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8838 | view full bio

Peter is a national thought leader on money laundering, tax fraud, and other financial crime. He is the author of Criminal Tax, Money Laundering, and Bank Secrecy Act Litigation, a comprehensive legal treatise published by Bloomberg…

hardyp@ballardspahr.com | 215.864.8838 | view full bio

Peter is a national thought leader on money laundering, tax fraud, and other financial crime. He is the author of Criminal Tax, Money Laundering, and Bank Secrecy Act Litigation, a comprehensive legal treatise published by Bloomberg BNA.  Peter co-chairs the Practising Law Institute’s Anti-Money Laundering program, and serves on the Steering Committee for the Cambridge Forum on Sanctions & AML Compliance

He advises corporations and individuals from many industries against allegations of misconduct ranging from money laundering, tax fraud, mortgage fraud and lending law violations, securities fraud, and public corruption.  He also advises on compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering requirements.  Peter handles complex litigation involving allegations of fraud or other misconduct.

Peter spent more than a decade as a federal prosecutor before entering private practice, serving as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Philadelphia working on financial crime cases. He was a trial attorney for the Criminal Section of the Department of Justice’s Tax Division in Washington, D.C.

Read more about Peter D. HardyEmailPeter's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Money Laundering Watch
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo