Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Consumer Lending Industry Targeted by the Alabama Legislature

By Graham W. Gerhardt on March 20, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

loan agreementLast month, a group of 45 members of Alabama’s House of Representatives introduced a proposed amendment to the Alabama Constitution that would cap the interest rate a lender may charge an individual on a “consumer loan, line of credit, or other financial product.” The proposed amendment, currently known as House Bill 321, is a direct attack on the Alabama Deferred Presentment Services Act and the Small Loan Act, and it contains a proposed interest rate cap of 36 percent per year for covered loans. This is the same cap proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in its June 2016 proposed rulemaking on payday, vehicle title, and certain high-cost installment loans. House Bill 321 has now been referred to the Alabama House of Representatives’ Committee on Constitution, Campaigns and Elections.

On March 7, 2017, another far-reaching bill was introduced in the Alabama Senate. This bill, Senate Bill 284, also targets all lending institutions, including traditional banks. Under existing law, for a loan in which the principal amount is $2,000 or more, the parties may agree to any rate of interest so long as it is not “unconscionable.” Senate Bill 284, however, proposes a 60 percent annualized interest rate cap on loans greater than $2,000. Additionally, the bill would prohibit consumers from obtaining car title loans, which are currently governed by the Alabama Pawnshop Act. The bill would also establish a 30-day term on all payday loans and require an automatic three-month payment extension when a borrower is unable to meet his or her repayment obligations within the initial 30-day term. It would also cap the number of payday loan transactions that a borrower can enter into during a 12-month period. Senate Bill 284 has been referred to the Alabama Senate’s Committee on County and Municipal Government.

House Bill 321 and Senate Bill 284 follow numerous other bills that have been introduced in the Alabama Legislature over the past few years that seek lending reform. This trend toward legislation that is specifically aimed at the payday, title and other small-dollar consumer loan industry is likely to continue, both in Alabama and across the country.

For more details about these topics, please contact one of the authors of this post.

Photo of Graham W. Gerhardt Graham W. Gerhardt

Graham Gerhardt represents financial institutions in civil litigation throughout the country. He regularly assists clients in both the forward mortgage and reverse mortgage industries. Graham frequently litigates in federal court where he defends lenders and loan servicers accused of violating federal statutes, most…

Graham Gerhardt represents financial institutions in civil litigation throughout the country. He regularly assists clients in both the forward mortgage and reverse mortgage industries. Graham frequently litigates in federal court where he defends lenders and loan servicers accused of violating federal statutes, most commonly TILA, RESPA, the FDCPA, the FCRA, and the TCPA. He also represents clients in state court, defending against claims such as wrongful foreclosure, fraud and deceptive trade practices. Graham oversees these suits through all stages of the legal process, including bench trials, jury trials and frequent depositions and mediations.

Read more about Graham W. GerhardtEmailGraham's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Financial Services Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo