Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Banamex USA Forfeits $97 Million to Resolve Bank Secrecy Act Violations

By Evan Abrams on May 26, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Banamex USA (“BUSA”) has agreed to forfeit $97.44 million and enter into a non-prosecution agreement with the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to resolve Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) violations.  BUSA is owned by Citigroup Inc. and is a leading money transmitter specializing in sending remittances from the US to Mexico.  The agreement, announced on May 22, also obligates BUSA and Citigroup to report any evidence or allegations of BSA or anti-money laundering (“AML”) violations to DOJ for a one year period.  Additionally, Citigroup must report to DOJ on its efforts to enhance BSA compliance at its subsidiaries.

According to DOJ’s press release, between 2007 and 2012 BUSA’s monitoring system issued alerts on more than 18,000 transactions totaling over $142 million.  Despite these alerts, BUSA initiated less than 10 investigations and filed just nine suspicious activity reports (“SARs”).  No SARs were filed on remittance transactions from 2010 to 2012.  Additionally, BUSA had only two employees with responsibility for BSA/AML compliance and those employees had other time-consuming responsibilities as well.  The DOJ press release further notes that BUSA was aware of the need to improve its BSA/AML compliance program for years, but failed to implement needed enhancements such as adding additional staff.  As part of the agreement, BUSA admitted to willfully failing to maintain an effective AML compliance program and willfully failing to file SARs.  In resolving the matter, DOJ took into account Citigroup and BUSA’s robust remedial actions and cooperation with the investigation.  

A related civil matter brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and California Department of Business Oversight was resolved in July of 2015 with BUSA being ordered to pay a $140 million civil money penalty.  In March of this year, FDIC announced enforcement actions against four former BUSA executives for BSA related violations.  Citigroup is currently in the process of closing BUSA and expects operations of that unit to cease by June 30.

The BUSA agreement is one of the first agreements between DOJ and a financial institution under the Trump administration.  The Obama administration was widely seen as taking an aggressive enforcement approach toward financial institutions, especially in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.  It remains unclear whether such an approach will continue under the Trump administration, but the BUSA agreement represents an early data point to consider.  The BUSA penalty is considerably less than what some other banks have paid in recent years for BSA/AML violations.  For example, in 2012 HSBC agreed to pay $1.9 billion in fines and forfeiture, though that case involved allegations of sanctions violations as well.

Photo of Evan Abrams Evan Abrams

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in…

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in industries including semiconductors, metals, and digital security. Evan’s anti-money laundering (AML) practice focuses on helping financial institutions comply with federal and state AML rules, particularly money transmitters and entities involved in creating, exchanging, or dealing in cryptocurrencies and tokens. Evan counsels clients in a variety of export controls and sanctions matters related to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and various sanctions programs under US and international law. In addition, Evan routinely assists clients on anti-corruption investigations and enforcement actions.

Read Evan’s full bio.

Read more about Evan AbramsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo