Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FATF Continues Suspension of Countermeasures Against Iran, but Call for Enhanced Due Diligence Remains

By Evan Abrams on June 30, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”) has announced the continued suspension of countermeasures against Iran. FATF, the international standards setting body for anti-money laundering (“AML”) and combating the financing of terrorism (“CFT”), maintains a list of high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions that may be subject to calls for enhanced due diligence and countermeasures.  Iran was previously subject to FATF calls for countermeasures, but the organization granted a temporary suspension in June of 2016 after Iran committed to implementing an action plan designed to address its AML/CTF deficiencies.

At its plenary meeting on June 23, FATF renewed its suspension, which had previously been granted for a 12 month period. While the suspension of countermeasures is highly significant for Iran, the country continues to be included on FATF’s so-called “blacklist” of high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions and remains subject to FATF’s call for enhanced due diligence.

FATF’s initial suspension of countermeasures came on the heels of the Iran nuclear deal (formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA) and the sanctions relief incorporated in that agreement. Many observers expected that sanctions relief would generate significant interest by non-US companies with regard to business opportunities in Iran (US persons continue to be barred from most Iranian business opportunities).  However, international business has been slow to return to Iran due to a variety of factors including concerns over remaining US sanctions, corruption risks, and money laundering.  FATF’s continued suspension of its call for countermeasures is an important step in ameliorating some of the AML concerns regarding Iran, but many businesses likely will continue to view the country wearily until it is removed from FATF’s blacklist and FATF ends its call for enhanced due diligence.  Such action likely will not occur until FATF determines that Iran has completed implementing its action plan.  The FATF statement did not include any timetable for expected completion.

Photo of Evan Abrams Evan Abrams

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in…

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in industries including semiconductors, metals, and digital security. Evan’s anti-money laundering (AML) practice focuses on helping financial institutions comply with federal and state AML rules, particularly money transmitters and entities involved in creating, exchanging, or dealing in cryptocurrencies and tokens. Evan counsels clients in a variety of export controls and sanctions matters related to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and various sanctions programs under US and international law. In addition, Evan routinely assists clients on anti-corruption investigations and enforcement actions.

Read Evan’s full bio.

Read more about Evan AbramsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo