Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Dual-listed companies beware

By Michael Bookman on August 23, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Securities class action filings have hit record highs in the United States. In 2016, the United States observed the highest number of securities class action filings since “the early 2000s dot-com crash.”[1] By July of this year, 246 new securities class actions claims were filed in U.S. federal courts.[2] This phenomenon comes as little surprise; these numbers reflect the recent upward trend in securities class action claims observed over the past number of years in the United States.

Canada, on the other hand, is not yet experiencing the same trend. In 2016, nine new securities class action claims were filed. With the exception of 2015, this figure is lower than the number of claims filed in any year annually since 2010.[3] These lower numbers of claims may be explained by differences in the litigation climate or incentive structures for plaintiff’s counsel.  What is clear is that companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) tend to face less litigation risk. From 2011 to 2016, 44 securities class actions were filed against companies listed on the TSX.  This translates to a litigation risk of about 0.5% per year.[4] In comparison, companies listed on the major securities exchanges in the United States faced a litigation risk of approximately 3.1% per year over the same period.[5]

Canadian dual-listed companies, however, face increased risk. Six out of the nine class actions filed in Canada in 2016 involved companies that were also sued in parallel in the United States.[6] In fact, since 2006, approximately half of all securities class actions launched in the United States against Canadian companies have a corresponding claim in Canada.[7]

This data appears to suggest that Canadian companies listed both on Canadian and American securities exchanges are at a higher risk of securities class action lawsuits than companies listed solely on the TSX.

The author would like to thank Fahad Diwan, Student-At-Law,  for his contribution to this article.


[1] Bradley A. Heys & Robert Patton, “Trends in Canadian Securities Class Actions: 2016 update” (2016) NERA Economic Consulting Report at 1.
[2] Stefan Boettrich & Svetlana Starykh, “Securities Class Actions: 2016 Full-Year Review and Mid-2017 Flash Update” (24 July 2017), Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, online: <https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/24/securities-class-actions-2016-full-year-review-and-mid-2017-flash-update/>.
[3] Supra note 1 at 2.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid at 6.
[7] Ibid at 7.

Photo of Michael Bookman Michael Bookman
Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Securities Litigation and Enforcement
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo