Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Alabama Adopts New Law Governing Virtual Currency Transactions

By Benjamin Jensen on August 30, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This month a new law governing virtual currency and online transactions went into effect in Alabama. The Alabama Monetary Transmission Act was passed by the legislature in May and replaces the “Sale of Checks Act” which had been in effect since 1961. The legislation regulates transactions involving virtual currency, such as BitCoin, as well as traditional money transfers.

Under the Act, unless exempted by the statute, persons engaged in the business of monetary transmissions must obtain a license from the Commission. Among the persons and entities excluded from the Act and its licensing requirements are banks, bank holding companies, futures merchants, governmental entities, broker-dealers and securities clearing firms.

In addition to imposing licensing requirements, the Act establishes a record-keeping process enabling the Alabama Securities Commission to audit transactions by licensees and their authorized delegates. Licensees under the Act must maintain records of each payment instrument or stored-value sold or acquired, as well as maintain general ledgers, bank statements and reconciliation records for a minimum of five years. All records required to be maintained by the Act are subject to examination by the Commission and must be made available within five business days of request.

The Act also provides the Commission with the ability to enforce civil and criminal penalties for violation of the Act. Civil penalties of $1,000 per day, plus the Commission’s cost of examination may be imposed for violation. Additionally, the Act makes engaging in money transmitting activities without a license a Class C felony, while making false statements or certifications in records maintained under the Act are a Class D felony. The Act does grant persons aggrieved by orders by the Commission under the Act the right to a hearing.

Photo of Benjamin Jensen Benjamin Jensen

Benjamin Jensen is partner in the firm’s Business Litigation Group, where he is a member of the Intellectual Property Litigation and Data Privacy and Security Practice Teams. His practice involves representing clients in complex business litigation matters in state and federal courts, with…

Benjamin Jensen is partner in the firm’s Business Litigation Group, where he is a member of the Intellectual Property Litigation and Data Privacy and Security Practice Teams. His practice involves representing clients in complex business litigation matters in state and federal courts, with a focus on matters involving intellectual property, data security, and contract disputes. Benjamin’s practice also includes representing health care providers and corporate clients in regulatory matters before the Connecticut departments of Health, Social Services, and Banking. Read his rc.com bio here.

Read more about Benjamin JensenEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo