Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Open Investment? Trump Blocks Lattice Semiconductor/Canyon Bridge Deal, Following CFIUS Recommendation

By Evan Abrams on September 13, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As many CFIUS-watchers were expecting, the President has just blocked the Lattice Semiconductor/Canyon Bridge deal.  CFIUS recommended that the President take this action because of national security concerns, and no President has refused to follow such a blocking recommendation by CFIUS.

In most cases, where CFIUS has made such a recommendation, the parties have abandoned the deal rather than waiting for the President to act.  This is only the fourth time that parties to a deal have forced presidential action:  at the recommendation of CFIUS, President George HW Bush ordered a divestment in 1990, President Obama ordered a divestment in 2012 and blocked a deal in 2016, and President Trump now has blocked this Lattice Semiconductor/Canyon Bridge deal.  All cases have involved Chinese companies.  (Steptoe has previously written on the 2012 and 2016 actions.)

A statement issued in conjunction with President Trump’s blocking order asserts that “Consistent with the longstanding, bi-partisan US commitment to open investment, the CFIUS process focuses exclusively on identifying and addressing national security concerns.  This focused mandate reinforces our commitment to welcoming foreign investment, while at the same time reinforcing our commitment to protecting national security.”  Recent CFIUS challenges faced by many foreign investors – not limited to Chinese investors – raise questions about the current strength of the open investment commitment, previously affirmed by presidents of both parties.  In particular, while CFIUS has continued to clear some Chinese investments, Chinese investors may be skeptical.  No doubt CFIUS will have ample opportunity to demonstrate continued commitment to an open investment policy.

Photo of Evan Abrams Evan Abrams

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in…

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in industries including semiconductors, metals, and digital security. Evan’s anti-money laundering (AML) practice focuses on helping financial institutions comply with federal and state AML rules, particularly money transmitters and entities involved in creating, exchanging, or dealing in cryptocurrencies and tokens. Evan counsels clients in a variety of export controls and sanctions matters related to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and various sanctions programs under US and international law. In addition, Evan routinely assists clients on anti-corruption investigations and enforcement actions.

Read Evan’s full bio.

Read more about Evan AbramsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo