Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Government Accountability Office Urges FERC to Improve Data Collection and Assessment of Capacity Market Performance

By Adrienne Thompson & Daniel Archuleta on December 19, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On December 7, 2017, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) issued a report summarizing its review of FERC’s oversight of the nation’s four regional capacity markets.  The GAO found generally that “FERC has not fully assessed the overall performance of capacity markets,” and the agency recommends that FERC improve data quality, use consistent metrics reported through standardized definitions, and establish goals, performance metrics, and risk tolerance levels for capacity markets.  The report comes at a time when FERC is considering significant capacity market-related issues, including the Department of Energy-initiated “Grid Reliability and Resilience Pricing” docket (see October 2, 2017 Edition of the WER), and reliability-focused pricing reforms from the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (see November 21, 2017 edition of the WER).

According to the GAO, Congress directed the agency to conduct this review as part of a Congressional bill for 2016 energy and water development appropriations.  The report itself describes the four U.S. capacity markets—ISO New England Inc., Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., New York Independent System Operator, Inc., and PJM—and how they have changed over the years; examines available information about resource adequacy and related costs in regions with and without capacity markets; and examines FERC’s oversight of capacity markets.

As the report argued, although FERC works with grid operators and other parties to oversee capacity markets and address misconduct by participants, FERC has no comprehensive means of assessing the overall performance of the four capacity markets.  “In particular,” the report stated, “FERC has not established performance goals for capacity markets, measured progress against those goals, or used performance information to make changes to capacity markets as needed.”  The lack of visibility into capacity market performance may pose a problem, the report cautions, and exacerbate concerns by some observers that market design problems are failing to ensure resource adequacy—a topic touching on the other ongoing FERC dockets noted above.  “By more fully assessing performance,” the report concludes, “FERC may increase opportunities to identify and address potential performance problems and to share effective approaches across capacity markets.  This may help ensure customers do not pay more than necessary for resource adequacy.”

A copy of the GAO’s report, along with highlights from the report, can be found here.

 

Photo of Daniel Archuleta Daniel Archuleta

Daniel Archuleta helps energy clients handle critical matters, especially those pertaining to the FERC in both the gas pipeline and electric utility industries.

Read more about Daniel ArchuletaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Blog:
    Washington Energy Report
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo