Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Waymo Rings in the New Year with Accusation of Discovery Abuse against Competitor Uber

By Matt Gander on January 5, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In the most recent installment of the long running saga between Waymo and Uber over autonomous vehicle technology, Waymo has accused Uber of intentionally withholding evidence from discovery. Specifically, Waymo alleges that Uber failed to produce a letter of resignation from its former Global Intelligence Manager, Richard Jacobs. Waymo asserts that the letter is “[e]vidence that the Jacobs documents [that allegedly had been taken from Waymo and ultimately brought to Uber] were broadly known within Uber … [and] would confirm that these documents were not mistakenly withheld (as Uber’s witnesses have claimed), but that they were instead intentionally concealed as part of an overall cover-up.” The existence of the letter and related correspondence came to light when a prosecutor, working on a separate (criminal) investigation, turned it over to U.S. District Judge William Alsup, the presiding judge in the civil case. Judge Alsup has not yet ruled on Waymo’s motion.

Photo of Matt Gander Matt Gander
Read more about Matt GanderEmail
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Trade Secrets Trends
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo