Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

EPA Publishes Third Round of Final Area Designations Under the SO2 NAAQS

By Margaret Campbell & Shawn O'Brien on January 11, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 9, 2018, the EPA published the third round of final area designations under the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.  In this round, the EPA identified six (6) nonattainment areas located in Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Puerto Rico and Guam.  EPA designated 23 areas as unclassifiable and all other areas as attainment/unclassifiable.  The primary focus in this round was on those areas electing to rely on ambient air quality modeling to assess attainment with the standard.

The nonattainment areas are tied to specific facilities and each area represents just that portion of the affected counties or parish where the facility is located.  The following table shows the nonattainment area designations by county/parish and the associated facilities:

State Area Name County/Parish Affected Facility
Florida Hillsborough-Polk

Hillsborough (p)

Polk (p)

Mosaic Fertilizer – New Wales
Guam Pita-Cabras Pita-Cabras

Cabras electric generating facility

Pita electric generating facility

Indiana Huntington Township Huntington (p) Isolatek (mineral products)
Louisiana Evangeline Parish Evangeline (p) Cabot Corporation (manufacturing)
Puerto Rico San Juan Catano, Toa Baja (p), San Juan (p), Guaynabo (p) and Bayamon (p)

PREPA San Juan electric generating facility

PREPA Palo Seco electric generating facility

Puerto Rico Guayama-Salinas Salinas (p) PREPA Aguirre electric generating facility

*(p) = partial county

 

In some instances, EPA overrode some of the state’s recommended designations. For instance, EPA disagreed with Indiana’s recommended designation of unclassifiable for part of Huntington County and issued a final nonattainment designation. In its response to comments document, EPA explained that the modeling data for the area around the Isolatek (Mineral Products) facility violated the NAAQS. The EPA also disagreed with Louisiana’s recommended designation of unclassifiable for part of Evangeline Parish and designated that part of the Parish in the area around Cabot Corporation as nonattainment. In addition to these states, EPA also disagreed with Florida’s recommended attainment or unclassifiable designation for part of the Hillsborough-Polk area and designated the area surrounding the Mosaic-New Wales facility as nonattainment. Unlike the previously discussed states, Puerto Rico and Guam recommended nonattainment designations for their respective counties, which were accepted by EPA.

EPA noted that in its fourth and final round of designations, which is due in December 2020, it will designate the remaining areas — approximately 50 undesignated areas where states and sources have installed and started operating a new SO2 monitors. Thus, the next and final

  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Environmental Law & Policy Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo