Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Can U.S. Allies Sidestep New Steel and Aluminum Tariffs?

By Nithya Nagarajan & Jeffrey Neeley on March 16, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The recent announcement by the White House that it intends to unilaterally impose 25 percent tariffs on steel imports and 10 percent tariffs on aluminum imports from all countries except Canada and Mexico has created significant uncertainty among foreign exporters.

It is of great import that Canada and Mexico are excluded from the imposition of section 232 duties for the time being. The European Union, Australia and South Korea have expressed a desire for similar exclusions to be applied to them. In fact, the EU and Australia are almost assured of an exemption based upon press reports. But where does that leave other important allies such as Turkey, India, Brazil and a host of other steel-exporting nations?

Exclusions and exemptions for key allies are possible through strategic bilateral negotiations with the United States, as long as the resulting trade relationships do not negatively impact the U.S. steel and aluminum industries. Countries will be removed from coverage of the Section 232 duties if “a satisfactory alternative means to address the threat to the national security” can be negotiated with them.

One caveat: Any exclusions are considered to be provisional and can be withdrawn should there be a disagreement between the United States and its trading partner.

In short, to play the game, each country has to have a seat at the table. Those countries that sit back and wait for others to start the negotiation process for potential exclusions and exemptions will likely be left waiting, while those who negotiated exclusions enjoy continued market access.

Other Options

Other viable options for foreign exporters and U.S. importers include:

  • Export further processed goods to the United States that do not fall within the specified Harmonized Trade Schedule (HTS) numbers for steel and aluminum as articulated in the Section 232 proclamations.
  • Set up processing facilities and/or manufacturing facilities in the United States that will not only open up access to the U.S. domestic market but also potentially be a steppingstone for increased access to Canada and Mexico.
  • Encourage trading partners to start negotiation for country exclusions based on specific national security considerations.
  • U.S. importers should prepare to request exclusions for supply considerations and a lack of U.S. production capacity of comparable products.

For further information, contact Nithya Nagarajan or Jeffrey S. Neeley.

Photo of Nithya Nagarajan Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory…

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory actions before the Department of Commerce, International Trade Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and defends clients in appeals before the Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels and the World Trade Organization. In addition to her body of U.S. experience, Nithya is also well-versed in international trade issues in China and India.

Read more about Nithya NagarajanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jeffrey Neeley Jeffrey Neeley

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export…

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export control, and other import/export issues.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    International Trade Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo