Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Korean FTC Issues Fines Over Loot Box Advertising

By James Gatto on April 9, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

According to a recent news article, the Korean FTC fined three game companies for allegedly not making clear disclosures regarding the odds associated with certain loot boxes. Loot boxes are items that players can win or buy and that give the player a virtual item, but the players do not know which one until they “open” the box. According to the article, some of the games encouraged players to buy loot boxes to collect 16 puzzle pieces, and award players with special in-game items once the collection is completed. This mechanic, known as Kompu Gacha,  was once popular in Japan until the Japanese FTC raised concerns there.

The Korean FTC expressed concerns over the way the odds of winning the items were advertised. In at least one of the cases, the game company used the phrase “random provision.” The FTC interpreted the phrase as suggesting equal odds of receiving the different items.
The issue of loot boxes has received a fair amount of attention lately. We recently prepared a post on  “Are Loot Boxes An Illegal Gambling Mechanic?” and an update to that post. As we also reported, Apple has required disclosure for loot box odds. Recently, Hawaii and Washington State proposed legislation relating to loot boxes.

There are at least three key issues with loot boxes. First, depending on how they are structured, some people argue they are illegal gambling. We are not aware of any U.S. court reaching this conclusion. As mentioned in our prior blog posts, various other countries are looking into that issue. Second, is the appropriate disclosures that must be made. Third, is that some people argue that loot boxes are harmful to kids for allegedly driving addictive behavior. There is much debate about these issues and little in the way of conclusive proof.

The ESRB recently helped step up the self-regulatory aspects of these issue. It recently announced that it will soon begin assigning a new “In-Game Purchases” label to physical (e.g., boxed) games. According to the ESRB press release: “The new In-Game Purchases label will be applied to games with in-game offers to purchase digital goods or premiums with real world currency, including but not limited to bonus levels, skins, surprise items (such as item packs, loot boxes, mystery awards), music, virtual coins and other forms of in-game currency, subscriptions, season passes and upgrades (e.g., to disable ads).”

The ESRB also launched ParentalTools.org to help educate parents on how kids spend money playing video games.

Game companies should continue to assess how they structure and advertise their loot box offerings and remain abreast of potential legislation that is being proposed.

 

Photo of James Gatto James Gatto

Jim Gatto is a partner in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He is Co-Leader of the Artificial Intelligence Team, the Blockchain & Fintech Team, and Leader of the Open Source Team.

Read more about James GattoEmail
  • Posted in:
    Sports and Gaming
  • Blog:
    Game Counsel
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo